The Indypendent
DONATE NOW - URGENT FALL 2009 FUNDRAISING CAMPAIGN
Search All Articles
Get The Indy by Email




Facebook Twitter

Donate

Subscribe

The IndyShop

RSS Available

Why we love The Indy






Sarah Stuteville
Journalism Workshops

Indykids

Posters!

A Threat to Peace
Artwork by The Indypendent Staff

A Threat to Peace - Artwork by The Indypendent

Buy Now! »


Army of None
Artwork by David Hollenbach

Army of None - Artwork by David Hollenbach

Buy Now! »


Community Resources

When Cameras are Outlawed Only Outlaws Will Have Cameras

By Jem Cohen
From the June 15, 2005 issue | Posted in Local | Email this article

On January 7th, 2005, I was filming from the window of an Amtrak train going from New York to Washington D.C., and my film was confiscated by police, due to supposed national security concerns.

I’d been shooting in 16mm, using an old, hand-wound Bolex. I was filming the passing landscape as I’ve often done over the past 15 years. I cannot pre-plan and attempt to obtain permits every time that I shoot; it is an inherently spontaneous act done in response to daily life and unannounced events.

subway
subway

I believe that it is the work and responsibility of artists to create such a record, so that we can better understand, and future generations can know, how we lived, what we build, what changes, and what disappears. Street shooting is one of the cornerstones of photography itself, and it is facing serious new threats, some declared, many not.

In New York, the MTA recently sought to forbid all unpermitted photography of and from its trains and subways. (After a public outcry and work by the New York Civil Liberties Union, which is also assisting with my case, they have decided to back down.)

As a filmmaker, I am concerned about what this kind of clampdown means both to our livelihood and to the public, historical record. As a citizen, I am concerned about a climate in which a person can be pulled off of a train and have their property confiscated without warning or redress.

Does stopping us from photographing a bridge make us safer when anybody can search the internet and see countless photographs of the same bridge? Are all of those photographs to be somehow suppressed? Given that anyone can purchase a hidden camera device with a lens the size of a shirt button, are the people openly taking pictures such an actual threat? What about all of those cell phones with cameras?

Under the rubric of an endless “war on terror,” we are seeing the denigration of due process, free speech, and the right to privacy, which are crucial safeguards of a free and democratic society.

Jem Cohen is a Brooklyn-based filmmaker whose work includes Instrument, Benjamin Smoke and Chain. Excerpted from Filmmaker Magazine.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
For nine years, The Indypendent has printed truth in the face of power. With political and economic systems faltering, there is an opportunity for real change from the bottom up. But this means having a vibrant independent media. Consider supporting The Indypendent as a monthly sustainer, donating as little as $5 a month. Please visit indypendent.org/donate.

Subscribe to the Indypendent!

Both comments and pings are currently closed.

One Response to “When Cameras are Outlawed Only Outlaws Will Have Cameras”

Deby Canfield Says:

Do you know where the quote (”when cameras are outlawed only outlaws will have cameras”) originally came from? I love to use that quote and I would like to be able to give credit to the creator!
And I totally agree with your article…. I am a serious street scene photographer, especially in New York (altho I currently live in Seattle.) I was questioned by police in New York last year while taking a photo of guys-in-suits standing outside the Merril-Lynch building.
Our rights to photograph public places and spaces should not be restricted!