First Person: Teachers’ Union Undermines Arabic-Language School
By Steve QuesterFrom the September 4, 2007 issue | Posted in Local | Email this article
But in either of the above scenarios, we’d know it wasn’t about the T-shirts.
However, this basic fact has been obscured in the recent takedown of Debbie Almontaser, the veteran Brooklyn educator, Yemeni-American and hijab-wearing Muslim who was the founding principal of the Khalil Gibran International Academy (KGIA), an Arabic-English dual-language public secondary school in Brooklyn that is scheduled to open with the new school year.
Before Almontaster was ambushed by the New York Post, KGIA endured months of vitriolic attacks from right-wing websites like Stop the Madrassa, Militant Islam Monitor and Little Green Footballs.
Predictably, the Post, the New York Sun, Fox News and New York State Assembly Member Dov Hikind jumped eagerly into the fray. It’s the same cast of characters, Daniel Pipes among them, who trumped up false charges of anti-Semitism to try to shut down Arab scholars at Columbia University in 2004 and 2005.
According to a report in the Aug. 17 Jewish Week, Almontaser was misled by Post reporters in an interview for an article published on Aug. 6.
The Post submitted questions in advance before the NYC Department of Education (NYC DOE) would agree to let them interview Almontaser. All of the questions were about KGIA. At the end of the interview, the reporter asked offhandedly what “intifada” means.
Almontaser, who is after all an educator, looked up the word in the dictionary, and translated it accurately: “shaking off.” The reporter then told Almontaser that the Yemeni-American organization on whose board she sits shares office space with Arab Women Active in the Arts and Media (AWAAM) and that AWAAM had produced a T-shirt with the words “Intifada NYC.” Almontaser, to her credit, refused to throw the girls from AWAAM under a bus, instead referring to their nonviolent struggle to shake off oppression in their own lives.
The Post quoted her as saying “I understand it is developing a negative connotation due to the uprising in the Palestinian-Israeli areas. I don’t believe the intention is to have any of that kind of [violence] in New York City. I think it’s pretty much an opportunity for girls to express that they are part of New York City society … and shaking off oppression.”
On the same day the article appeared, Almontaser wrote in an e-mail to community supporters, “I was misrepresented and trapped by the reporter. Those were not my exact words, and the words I did use were taken out of context.” Later that day, she released a statement through the NYCDOE that read, “The word ‘intifada’ is completely inappropriate as a T-shirt slogan. I regret suggesting otherwise. By minimizing the word’s historical associations, I implied that I condone violence and threats of violence. That view is anathema to me.”
RANDI WEINGARTEN INTERVENES
On Aug. 7, the Post, without reference to Almontaser’s Aug. 6 statement of regret, ran an editorial asking, “What is she doing with the job in the first place?”
On Aug. 8, the Post published a letter from Randi Weingarten, president of my union, the United Federation of Teachers, in which she wrote, “I agree wholeheartedly with your editorial,” and, “While the city teachers’ union initially took an open-minded approach to this school, both parents and teachers have every right to be concerned about children attending a school run by someone who doesn’t instinctively denounce campaigns or ideas tied to violence.”
In her letter, Weingarten chose to ignore both Almontaser’s Aug. 6 statement and her proven record as a peacemaker. On Aug. 9 the Post quoted Weingarten saying, among other things, “maybe, ultimately, she should not be a principal.” On Aug. 10 Almontaser resigned, perhaps under pressure from Schools Chancellor Joel Klein and/or Mayor Bloomberg.
In her resignation letter, she wrote, “I have spent the past two decades of my life
building bridges among people of all faiths — particularly among Muslims and Jews.
Unfortunately, a small group of highly misguided individuals has launched a relentless attack on me because of my religion.”
Rabbi Michael Paley, scholar-in-residence at United Jewish Appeal-Federation of New York (Paley’s daughter is in charge of enrollment at KGIA), told Jewish Week that the campaign against Almontaser was a “high-tech lynching.”
If it was a lynching, my union did not string up the rope, but it was the UFT that kicked away the stool. I’m at a loss to explain why my union, which continues to support KGIA, piled on when the attacks on the school’s principal were at their shrillest. The union leadership insists that we were acting on our deep commitment to peace and nonviolence, but that’s a strange excuse for joining in a transparently racist and Islamophobic attack. I suspect that Weingarten, sensing which way the wind was blowing on Aug. 7 and 8, decided to play to the basest instincts of some of her rank and file.
The membership of the UFT is middle class and majority white, and many are Jewish. Not all middle-class white Jews lend credence to the Almontaser witch hunt — I’m middle-class, white, and Jewish myself — but Weingarten was counting on many of her members being solidly behind the Post on this issue. She may be right. But I don’t think that she counted on the firestorm of criticism she was to endure after Almontaser’s resignation. Those of us in the UFT and outside of it, who are outraged at the attacks on Almontaser, are not going to just let this matter drop. We will continue to expose the racist consequences of Weingarten’s statements, so that the next time the right-wing media hit squads go after an educator, she’ll think twice before lending them her voice.
Steve Quester is a Brooklyn-based UFT Chapter leader and veteran early childhood educator. For more, see Jews for Racial and Economic Justice (jfrej.org) and Arab Women Active in the Arts and Media (awaam.org).
RAISING THEIR VOICES : More than 200 supporters of the Khalil Gibran International Academy, including Sara Said Alkhulaidi, whose brother will be attending the school in the fall, gathered Aug. 21 outside the NYC Department of Education to protest the forced resignation of Debbie Almontaser, the former principal of the school. PHOTO: ULA KURAS
2 Responses to “First Person: Teachers’ Union Undermines Arabic-Language School”
October 25th, 2007 at 5:37 pm
comparing it to Malcom X t-shirts is like comparing oranges to poisonous apples.
Intifida symbolizes the deliberate murder of civilians in the name of civil unrest. A school principal should serve as an example to students in her words and deeds; murder and terrorism should never ever be whitewashed or endorsed.
Let’s wake up the truth




















August 31st, 2007 at 11:35 am
I want to thank the editors of the Indypendent for giving me an opportunity to speak out on this issue. I wish to take issue, though, with the title of the piece. (For the record, the Indypendent editors gave me an opportunity to come up with a title prior to publication, and I should have been more helpful.)
To refer to KGIA as an “Arab school” is to imply that it is a school for Arabs. It is not. It is a New York City public school, and it will serve a diverse groups of learners, as do all New York City public schools. The fact that it is a dual-language program in Arabic and English which recruits students whose dominant language is English and students whose dominant language is Arabic will mean that it will probably have a relatively larger percentage of Arab-American students than many other schools, but half or more of the students will be of heritages other than Arab-American.
Please come out to support the students, families, and faculty/staff of Khalil Gibran International Academy.
Also, PLEASE note & RESPECT the GUIDELINES at the bottom of this message- -
Announcing a silent vigil to support the children, parents, teachers and administration of the Kahlil Gibran International Academy.
Tuesday, September 4, 2007, at the Academy, 345 Dean Street, near 3rd Avenue , Brooklyn.
Gather at 7:30 am for breakfast at the welcome table, silent witness at 8:00 am .
We welcome all those who can support the statement and the guidelines below.
THE STATEMENT
We are Brooklynites who stand in silence today to support the opening of the Khalil Gibran International Academy , its staff, teachers, parents and children. We hope that it will grow and thrive.
We are Brooklynites of different races, many ethnic and national backgrounds, and several religious affiliations who believe that there is room in our public schools system for a school that teaches Arabic language and culture along with math, English and social studies and that it can remain fully public while doing so.
We believe there is a need in our complex world for students of all backgrounds to prepare to live in and lead their communities, states and our country, and that languages such as Chinese, Spanish, Hebrew and Arabic will be crucial to that preparation. As there are schools and programs that include the teaching of Chinese and Hispanic language and culture, so now there is one that teaches Arabic language and culture.
This is in keeping with the most admirable feature of Brooklyn cultural life: its genuine celebration of diversity that serves as a model for the worldwide human family. It is important that, beginning with our children, we teach and remind each other that we are all sisters and brothers, that we can teach and learn from each other, that each culture and faith tradition has its own integral beauty.
We are saddened that the complex and often violent world in which we live has intruded on the development of this school in a way that has created tensions rather than healing them. Brooklyn has always been a place of many cultures living side by side in relative calm. Sometimes the calm is shattered. We hope in this case it can be healed quickly so that the children for whom the school has been created, and their parents, can go about the business of learning, their and our primary concern.
We are deeply distressed at the way certain media have distorted the story of this school’s development and have relentlessly attacked its director to the point of resignation. Because we believe certain media are incapable of reporting on this school fairly, we stand in silence, offering this statement only.
(This statement was drafted by Rabbi Ellen Lippmann, Carol Horwitz and Rev. Tom Martinez, organizers affiliated with Brooklyn’s annual Children of Abraham Peace Walk).
____________________________________________
GUIDELINES
1) We are quiet. Little sound, and no amplified sound
2) We have a statement to hand out, but don’t otherwise speak to the media - or have one designated speaker only
3) We have one big sign and no other banners from other organizations
5) No angry statements re the mayor, chancellor, UFT pres
6) No talk about intifada, Israel, the occupation et al