By Bennett Baumer
In 2008, labor unions will spend big and mobilize hundreds of thousands of workers to organize new members and campaign for Democratic Party candidates. The nuts and bolts of labor struggles are often lost in the presidential race, however.
Union membership has continued its decades- long decline, with only 12 percent of the workforce and 7.4 percent of the private sector now unionized. Last year saw a major setback in labor regulation that could make it harder for workers to join unions. Nonetheless, the writers’ strike is still going strong and tens of thousands of Verizon workers are poised to unionize.
Writers’ Strike
The Writers Guild of America (WGA) strike against the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers (or, as David Letterman calls it: “Cowards, Cutthroats and Weasels”) is one of the rare occasions when a labor stoppage grips America’s attention span. On Nov. 5, 2007, about 12,000 writers in the West and East Coast branches of the union struck over a number of demands, including the core issue of writers wanting a greater percentage of “residuals” (a payment each time one of their works is consumed).
“We all know that no payments on new media equals a rollback in residuals. And given pattern bargaining, getting rid of our residuals means getting rid of residuals industry wide,” wrote WGA strike captain Alfredo Barrios on a blog about the labor stoppage.
The advent of the new media technology (Internet, cell phone downloads) has hurt the earnings of writers as the studios refuse to pay residuals when consumers stream content regardless of revenue generated.
The studios now pay just 1.2 percent of the distributor’s gross income to WGA members for media that consumers purchase online or through cell phones. On top of that, the WGA estimates that over the next three years big media and production companies will earn more than $4.6 billion in new media advertisements that accompany guild members’ work.
The strike’s roots began in the mid-1980s when the WGA took an 80 percent cut in home video residuals to help boost VHS technology. As VHS took off and gave way to DVDs, the WGA did not regain its share of the new technology’s profits. According to the WGA, writers receive about four cents for every DVD sold. That is a small fraction of the Entertainment Merchant Association’s estimated DVD industry of $16.5 billion.
The writers’ big demand – four extra cents for DVDs and 2.5 percent of new media gross income. If the WGA obtains a greater residual percentage, it sets a precedent for other media unions and future media technologies, and, most importantly, it wins the strike.
Card Check
In September 2007, the Bush administration- appointed majority on the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) further weakened workers’ right to join unions through “card checks.”
Because systematic anti-union activity by management has made union elections so difficult for labor to win, unions have initiated “card check” campaigns to organize workers. The card check process occurs when a majority of workers sign union representation cards or petitions calling for a union. Most card checks are part of “neutrality agreements” in which the employer agrees not to interfere with workers’ right to organize.
The NLRB struck a blow against card check campaigns in its “Dana/Metaldyne” ruling. It allowed union decertification if just 30 percent of employees file petitions demanding decertification as soon as a majority of the workforce gains card check recognition. The petitions are presented to the NLRB, which then holds a decertification vote.
Anti-union employees at the separate Dana and Metaldyne auto-parts manufacturing corporations filed decertification petitions weeks after workers joined the United Auto Workers (UA W) through the card check process.
Neutrality agreements usually occur in non-union shops where unions have organized the company’s other plants. Workers usually join labor unions either through voting in a secret ballot election that is organized and certified by the NLRB or card checks — the employer agrees to unionization when a majority of employees sign union cards.
Though the NLRB handed down the anti-union ruling it did not stop the UA W from organizing 2,500 workers at 11 different plants through card checks in 2007.
Verizon and “Neutrality”
In 2008, labor unions will undoubtedly see more anti-union employees file for decertification after card check certifications. Of 360 New York and New England Verizon technicians, 57 percent signed union cards in March 2007. Verizon has refused to recognize the process. In response, union organizers tried to pressure the phone company giant by having Congress members certify the process was valid.
Though only 360 workers are currently petitioning for unionization, it could lead to tens of thousands of Verizon workers joining unions in the future. Verizon signed a neutrality agreement in 2000 with the Communication Workers of America and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, the two unions that represent approximately 97,000 Verizon workers. The agreement prohibited Verizon from interfering with the effort to organize 35,000 non-union Verizon workers.
The two unions contend Verizon is ignoring the neutrality agreement, however. In the wake of the Dana/Metaldyne ruling, look for Verizon — and other corporations — to begin decertification drives and undermine neutrality agreements in 2008.
Illustration by Gary Martin





Comments
The Huffington Post is doing some good coverage of the strike. Check it out here.
http://search.huffingtonpost.com/search/?sp_a=sp100395aa&sp_k=&s...
The UAW had another huge organizing win up in Connecticut early this winter at the Foxwoods casino. The organized thousands of dealers at the Indian casino prompting the CEO to resign and the Mashantucket Pequot Tribe to file a suit trying to block the unionization effort (see: http://www.courant.com/business/hc-foxwoods0113.artjan12,0,1592539.story).
The Mashantucket Pequot Tribe will fight the union vote with flimsy allegations of "organizer harassment" and will line up poor scabs to do its bidding. The UAW ought to win. On the flip side, UFCW Local 371 is looking to take the back of the house and organize around 1,000 bartenders and food service workers. The UAW did not organize the shop go wall to wall which is puzzling considering they are way out of their original jurisdiction (auto) anyway.
ourant.com/business/hc-foxwoods0116.artjan16,0,3820770.story
Courant.com
Foxwoods Seeks To Nullify Union Vote
As More Organizing Occurs, Casino Says At Hearing That UAW Used Illegal Tactics
By MARK PETERS
Courant Staff Writer
January 16, 2008
Lawyers for Foxwoods Resort Casino said Tuesday that a November vote by table game dealers to form a union should be invalidated because a lack of Chinese-language ballots and unlawful tactics by organizers resulted in an unfair election.
Foxwoods made those arguments on the opening day of hearings in Hartford as it fights to block the United Auto Workers from representing 2,600 dealers.
The legal battle over the first union to represent casino workers at Foxwoods hasn't prevented further interest in organizing one of Connecticut's largest employers. Organizers for the United Food & Commercial Workers Union have begun collecting signatures from bartenders, cocktail servers and restaurant workers at Foxwoods in an effort to force a second federally supervised union vote at the casino, Brian Petronella, president of Local 371 in Westport, said Tuesday.
The food workers union is trying to organize 750 to 1,200 casino employees. Petronella said the ongoing fight over the UAW vote is common in organizing drives and isn't dissuading the food workers union. The union plans to collect signatures from a "supermajority" of potential members and will petition the National Labor Relations Board for a vote sometime in the next few months.
"This is a long process. I suspect [Foxwoods] will use every appeal they can," Petronella said.
A third union, the International Union of Operating Engineers, started a signature drive last August to unionize an estimated 250 plumbers, electricians and carpenters at the casino.
Foxwoods presented its arguments Tuesday before administrative law Judge Raymond P. Green, saying the NLRB made mistakes in conducting the vote and that interactions by union officials and some voters were unlawful.
Foxwoods' attorneys said the errors include printing the ballot only in English and providing notices explaining the election in only one form of the Chinese language, disenfranchising some Asian American dealers.
But attorneys for the UAW and labor board said the union and the board provided ample explanation of the election in a variety of languages. As for the ballot, they said, the casino didn't make a strong case that its dealers, who must conduct complicated casino games in English, couldn't understand the ballot.
Foxwoods also alleged that the UAW threatened and intimidated some dealers.
"One such threat was made in the presence of a voter's 12-year-old son. Others took place in front of casino patrons," said Richard Hankins, an attorney for Foxwoods.
The union scoffed at the allegations and accused Foxwoods of stalling.
Green is expected to make a ruling in coming weeks. Foxwoods, which is owned by the Mashantucket Pequot Tribe, is expected to continue its challenge if it does not prevail. Although the tribe did not make it part of this week's hearing, the tribe continues to contend that the NLRB doesn't have jurisdiction over the casino, which is on sovereign tribal land. The tribe could take that argument to federal court.
Contact Mark Peters at mrpeters @courant.com.
There is nothing like a few months of working for Verizon to make you say "how the hell did I get myself into this?".
The fact that it was a union job just made it worse I think, because management has it's way of making life pretty miserable for union supporters because there are always loopholes in the union contract rules.
It's great pay if you can stand being reduced to absolute slave labor.
I know the truth about the Foxwoods union because I work at Foxwoods. The truth is that the dealers are the highest paid workers within the casino. They have their own lounges for breaks, short-shifts and are the first to leave when business slows. The dealers at Foxwoods are not coal miners and they do not work in a sweat shop. They have a syndrome that affects many groups in a high-end tax bracket: Give me more.
Lastly, I have also experienced a unionized casino in action. With so many limitations of job scope, it is difficult to sustain a high level of guest service. For example, a valet attendant isn't allowed to help a guest with their luggage when a bellhop is busy. The guest waits or takes it themselves. Workers get lazy and the customer gets left out in the cold.
Add new comment