The Indypendent
DONATE NOW - URGENT FALL 2009 FUNDRAISING CAMPAIGN
Search All Articles
Get The Indy by Email




Facebook Twitter

Donate

Subscribe

The IndyShop

RSS Available

Why we love The Indy






Sarah Stuteville
Journalism Workshops

Indykids

Posters!

A Threat to Peace
Artwork by The Indypendent Staff

A Threat to Peace - Artwork by The Indypendent

Buy Now! »


Army of None
Artwork by David Hollenbach

Army of None - Artwork by David Hollenbach

Buy Now! »


Community Resources

Labor Lobby Melee

By Bennet Baumer
From the April 25, 2008 issue | Posted in National | Email this article

Illustration by Gabriella Szpunt

Up to six busloads of Service Employees International Union (SEIU) organizers and members started a scrum inside the lobby of a hotel holding the Labor Notes Conference in Dearborn, Mich., on April 12. Labor Notes is a monthly progressive and union democracy journal. The SEIU group wanted to disrupt the banquet hall dinner where California Nurses Association (CNA) leaders, who SEIU accuses of busting an Ohio union drive, addressed 800 conference participants from various unions.

“They [SEIU protestors] were banging on the doors like a marching band base drum. Real quick they rushed through the door,” said Roland Day, a unionized dockworker from Baltimore.

In the lobby, Day said that he and dozens of other conference participants formed a human chain in the attempt to stop the SEIU rush, but ended up clashing with organizers Frank Hornick and Rachel Holland who were accompanied by a horde, hundreds thick, of purple t-shirt-clad SEIU protestors.

“I tried to stop the big guy and was holding him back with all I had,” Day said.

Hornick, the 6’4” son of miner, said he had worked on the three-year campaign to organize more than 8,000 healthcare workers at Ohio based Catholic Healthcare Partners (CHP) facilities. He explained how CNA organizers had descended on the campaign’s March 2008 culmination to encourage nurses and other workers to vote against affiliating with the SEIU. The election was cancelled before going to a vote. The CNA has begun to organize nurses nationally, competing with SEIU for members.

“Our intent was to educate the conference; they knew what we were there for,” Hornick said. Holland, a petit 5’4”, told The Indypendent she sustained hand cuts and was “football tackled” by a conference participant and that SEIU’s goal was to “draw to light union-busting by unions.”

Things quickly got out of control in the lobby, as fliers spilled to the floor and a cacophony of chants, noisemakers and screams ensued from the SEIU group’s push towards the banquet doors.

“SEIU should hold their head in shame. Some of their people had purple bandanas over their face like the anarchists at WTO protests,” said Frank Halstead, a California Teamster.

In the midst of the donnybrook, retired union member Dianne Feeley was shoved to the floor by a SEIU member and hit her head on a the end of a table requiring stitches.

“I don’t feel the person did it on purpose,” Feeley said. Feeley commented she didn’t think many in the SEIU crowd knew they were protesting at a labor solidarity conference.

A BATTLE FOR THE NURSES

Central to the SEIU-CNA dispute are accusations by both organizations of raiding each other’s members and campaigns, and disagreements about the direction of the labor movement. The CNA is a mix of progressive politics — empowering female nurses to take on Republican politicians for the public interest — and old style unionism. The CNA only organizes nurses, prompting cries of elitism from the SEIU, which organizes healthcare professionals including nurses and technical workers, but also health aides and other service workers. The SEIU is almost singular in its mission, organize workers at all costs, and provokes criticism for its consolidation of smaller locals into mega unions and that it is autocratic and top down.

With the Ohio health care chain, the SEIU signed an election agreement where management agreed to be neutral and not to coerce workers against the union and SEIU would not run a traditional union drive. The SEIU had employed traditional organizing tactics for three years — running a campaign against the employer while rallying workers — but still couldn’t overcome CHP’s anti-union campaign.

“When you see a worker at a captive audience meeting, you’ll see how scared they are,” said Hornick, referring to an employer mandated anti-union meeting.

“When the employer agrees not to run an anti-union campaign, that’s historic,” Jennifer Farmer a SEIU spokesperson said.

But the devil is often in the details and in other neutrality agreements with employers, the CNA and even some SEIU locals accuse SEIU of selling out the workforce and the public interest. Furthermore, the CNA distributes literature with SEIU President Andy Stern on the cover of trade magazine Human Relations Outsourcing Today talking about how companies can outsource their labor relations to unions, arguing that unions be hiring halls a practice that has long existed in some industries.

“Their vision to grow is focused on signing agreements with corporate employers, essentially agreeing to anything,” Charles Idelson, CNA spokesperson said, referring to SEIU’s push to gain more members.

In California, the SEIU negotiated an agreement (now expired) with the nursing home industry that brought the union thousands of members but also included provisions against workers reporting bad employer practices to authorities and the union agreed to lobby for tort reform favorable to the nursing homes.

The feud is only getting worse. The CNA obtained a temporary restraining order against the SEIU April 16 for following the association’s members around the country to picket them. SEIU, however, got the order dismissed April 21. Both unions have competing websites that bash each other and seem willing to further escalate the battle with no mediation in sight.

Bennett Baumer is a member of the United Auto Workers (UAW) and a former SEIU organizer.


Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
For nine years, The Indypendent has printed truth in the face of power. With political and economic systems faltering, there is an opportunity for real change from the bottom up. But this means having a vibrant independent media. Consider supporting The Indypendent as a monthly sustainer, donating as little as $5 a month. Please visit indypendent.org/donate.

Subscribe to the Indypendent!

4 Responses to “Labor Lobby Melee”

M. Peligro Says:

An otherwise decent article, the author unfortunately and credulously took CNA at its word in the “debate” over neutrality agreements, which is entirely hypocritical:

CNA engages in the exact same types of neutrality agreements with employers like Catholic Healthcare West, as does SEIU and really every other successfully growing union uses.

When those unfamiliar with modern-day union organizing criticize neutrality as a “sweetheart deal,” it comes off as naive, because I imagine they do not know that the NLRB election process is rife with employer abuse and not a realistic option for most workers anymore. But of course CNA knows exactly that, so when they do it it’s clearly a smokescreen.

Notice they never explain exactly what were the terms of the supposed sweetheart deal in Ohio the CNA found so objectionable or a “sellout to workers,” because - aside from some egregious cases like the nursing home deal that was rightfully exposed and dropped - the extent of such agreements is: the boss agrees not to fire, harrass, or intimidate pro-union workers in the course of a campaign and the union agrees not to beat up on the boss. Some sweetheart deal.

Anonymous Says:

I think neutrality agreements can be a good tool to organize, but the SEIU’s agreement with the CA nursing home association - not so good. I think the SEIU, with a right-minded focus on unionizing the unorganized, gave away too much to the association in order to gain members. As Peligro notes above this agreement is no longer the status quo. But in many of these agreements, the devil is in the details.

Shum Preston Says:

Thank you for this article, Bennett.

One point: the poster defending SEIU missed the point about the Ohio deal. This election was actually filed by the employer…an employer filing for an election to represent their workers. CNA/NNOC has warned all hospital chains that if they try to impose this kind of representation on their employees from above, they are likely to have to deal with RNs coming to their hospitals and explaining to their employees what is happening to them. In Ohio, SEIU had no support, and most workers had no idea what they were voting on; that’s not the path to worker power.

Nightwalker Says:

Shum, you’re leaving aside one important piece of history. CNA threw the exact same hissy fit over SEIU’s organizing agreement with Tenet in 2003 - until Tenet offered CNA an identical deal in 2007, which they snapped up like a pit bull on a pork chop. Why should we assume that their hue and cry over CHP is any less hypocritical?

Leave a Reply