Time for a Taxpayers Revolt
By Medea Benjamin and Arun GuptaSeptember 28, 2008 | Posted in IndyBlog , National | Email this article
Congress will be voting this week on the biggest give-away of our tax dollars to the financial sector in our nation’s history. Despite attempts by legislators to portray this as a compromise bill that helps both Wall St. and Main St., in reality it represents an appalling transfer of wealth upward.
While there’s a distinct possibility the plan will pass this week, we should oppose it both before and after it passes. Jobs with Justice is calling for a national day of action against the bailout this Wednesday, Oct. 1. In conjunction with this, we are calling for actions against Congress on the same day. Building on the wave of protests against the Wall Street bailout last week, we must put Congress on notice that they pass this bill at their own risk. With just weeks left until the election, it’s the perfect chance to tell them they’ll be facing a taxpayer revolt if they vote for the bailout.
Look for the closest office of your Congressperson or Senator. Organize your family, friends, group, whomever to do a picket, hand out literature, flood the office with phone calls – whatever. The imperative is to act now. (For more information on alternative economic plans, organizing strategy and protests near you or how to announce your own, go to bailoutmainstreet.com.)
Despite talk of a crisis being averted, many are skeptical as to whether the bailout will even restore confidence – and credit – to the banking system. As one report notes, “Doubts remain as to how it could immediately thaw the frozen money and credit market.”
Even if the bailout somehow unclogs the banking sector, few economists think it will jumpstart the consumer credit machine. For one, over-leveraged, money-strapped banks will eagerly dump near-worthless securities on taxpayers for cash to bulk up their reserves. Plus, with working hours and wages declining, unemployment, home foreclosures and inflation surging, banks are in no mood to give consumers more credit, so consumption – and hence the economy – will continue to contract.
This is why the bill is a scam. For all the talk of transparency in the bailout, there has been zero transparency in the political process. We weren’t allowed to see any details of the bailout other than the government will go on a shopping binge of buying toxic mortgage-backed securities.
Our elected officials – who work for us – are trying to hide the fact that the fix is in. They are planning a shotgun wedding by slathering makeup on a rotting corpse, dumping it at the altar and hoping taxpayers don’t catch on before we’re trapped in a 30-year marriage to pay for this financial debacle.
The plan will be sold as fair to everyone and “the best deal” possible. Bullshit.
First, the cost is being minimized. The Wall Street Journal cheerily reports that in the worst-case scenario, the annual cost would be a measly $42 billion in interest and principal. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122245659564179649.html
A new study of banking crises around the world, however, puts the average cost at 16 percent of a country’s gross domestic product, which would amount to more than $2 trillion here. That’s more than $10,000 of future income for every single adult in the United States. http://www.economist.com/finance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=12305746
Everything else in the proposed bill is window dressing. Language in the draft states “The government can use its power … to help reduce the 2 million projected foreclosures in the next year.” That’s can, not will. Other measures for housing relief amount to tax breaks – so the banks get socialism, while the rest of us get to eat conservative orthodoxy.
Similarly, there are waffling words like “Meaningful judicial review of the Treasury Secretary’s action.” Does anyone believe that a Republican administration of the present or future would subject itself to “meaningful” review?
In terms of equity stakes, it’s limited to “opportunities” for ownership stakes and profit making in companies seeking a bailout. In all likelihood, this will amount to pennies of equity for each bailout dollar in a few companies.
And the provision to disburse the $700 billion in two installments is meaningless. Congress has just a 15-day window to vote to block the second payout, making it highly unlikely, and the next president can just veto the measure. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122260585791683335.html?mod=article-outset-box
The bill’s slogan is “Reinvest, Reimburse and Reform,” which echoes the New Deal’s rallying cry of “Relief, Reform and Reconstruction.” But deliberately eliminated is any relief and any rebuilding.
Is it any surprise that the Democratic leadership caved in on every proposal for direct aid to homeowners on the brink? And there was no attempt to push for the type of government intervention that could actually revive the economy: public works, national healthcare and alternative energy investments.
Provisions like limiting executive pay and cancelling golden parachutes are tossing out bones. Does it make any difference if some Wall Street billionaire can’t buy a new Gulf Stream jet or a new manor in Tuscany? What would make a difference is cancelling the Bush tax cuts, closing corporate tax loopholes, resurrecting the estate tax and ending the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. The super-rich can pick up the tab for once.
The Democrats said a bill that addressed the needs of ordinary Americans instead of Wall St. investors was simply “not feasible.” Funny that the Republicans never think that way. A small minority of Republicans in the House nearly killed the bill because they maintained iron-willed ideological unity. Of course it’s too much to expect a spineless Democratic leadership to do the same.
That’s where we come in. The free markets are completely discredited, and it’s almost certain that other economic crises are lurking down the road. Paradoxically, this means there is significant political space to build a broad consensus for a 21st-Century New Deal that would stop spending our tax dollars on war and Wall Street, and instead help struggling homeowners and build affordable housing; fund job creating projects for clean energy and rebuilding our infrastructure; and fund a universal health-care system that would help American families, while cutting the nation’s long-term healthcare costs.
It’s time to for a taxpayers revolt against this mind-boggling Wall St. bailout. It’s time to build a broad coalition to demand a 21st Century New Deal. This is our best, last hope.
To read more of The Indypendent’s recent economic coverage, click here.
Naomi Klein, author of the best-selling book, The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism, is a strong supporter of The Indypendent. To see a short video clip about what she had to say earlier this year, click here. Read her latest call to action, “Now is the Time to Resist Wall Street’s Shock Doctrine.”
7 Responses to “Time for a Taxpayers Revolt”
September 29th, 2008 at 2:24 pm
Stocks Plunge as House Rejects Bailout
By MICHAEL M. GRYNBAUM
Stocks Plunge as House Rejects Bailout
By MICHAEL M. GRYNBAUM
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/30/business/30markets.html?hp=&pagewanted=print
The Dow Jones industrials dropped suddenly on Monday afternoon after the bailout plan being voted on by the House of Representatives failed to pass.
The Dow, which had been trading down about 300 points for most of the afternoon, fell to a 600-point deficit before recovering slightly. The index was down more than 550 points as lawmakers scrambled, but failed, to round up votes to pass the package.
The House on Monday defeated the bill by a vote of 228-205.
The Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index was down 6.5 percent after dropping as far as 7 percent.
The drop reinforced the fear coursing through Wall Street as investors wondered whether the bailout plan would eventually pass Congress. Before the vote, supporters of the bill said they thought the legislation would squeak through with a slim majority. But as the initial period of voting ended, the bill appeared to be in danger of not passing the House.
Shares had fallen earlier in the day despite what lawmakers had described as an agreement on the bailout plan. Citigroup also snatched up the core business of Wachovia, the ailing banking giant, which had been in danger of collapse.
The Wachovia move, which was spearheaded by federal regulators, could have been taken as a sign that the government was eager to restore stability to the financial system. But the near-collapse of Wachovia, which was the nation’s fourth-largest bank, may have underscored the troubling sense among investors that any bank is vulnerable in the current crisis.
The world’s credit markets also remained under pressure. Yields on Treasuries dropped and lending rates stayed high, signs that investors remained deeply ill at ease about the health of the financial system.
Responding to the strain, the Federal Reserve moved to vastly increase the amount of liquidity it makes available to major players in the world financial system. The Fed will triple the size of its regular auctions for banks and work with nine other central banks to increase the flow of credit.
The Fed is hoping to combat a hoarding mentality that has arisen among banks, whose reluctance to lend — even to healthy institutions — has jammed up critical financial arteries that many small businesses depend on.
On Monday, the cost of borrowing euros for a three-month period rose to the highest price on record. Banks are charging enormous premiums for short-term financing. And money continued to flow into the safe space of Treasury bills and traditional hedges like gold, the price of which rose 2.2 percent.
Shares of Wachovia lost 90 percent of their value in electronic overnight, but the stock never opened on Monday morning as officials halted trading before the opening bell.
Citigroup shares fell, and shares of financial stocks traded lower. Morgan Stanley fell 11 percent and Goldman Sachs was off 8 percent.
European stocks, already sharply down at the New York open, fell further after the declines on Wall Street. Stocks in London and Paris were down more than 5 percent, and Frankfurt was down about 4 percent. In Asia, the benchmark Hong Kong index plummeted 4.3 percent overnight; Tokyo’s Nikkei 225 lost 1.2 percent.
President Bush appeared outside the White House at 7:30 a.m. on Monday, before the markets opened, to endorse the bailout legislation that was agreed upon over the weekend.
“A vote for this bill is a vote to prevent economic damage to you and your community,” the president said in a brief statement. “The impact of the credit crisis and housing correction will continue to affect our financial system and growth of our economy over time. But I am confident that in the long run, America will overcome these challenges.”
The problems in Europe came after government bailouts of several banks, including the British lender Bradford & Bingley and the Belgian-Dutch financial group, Fortis.
If anything, the moves created uncertainty about which institution would be next, said Jean Bruneau, a trader at Société Générale in Paris.
Shares of the Brussels-based lender Dexia fell 22.7 percent as investors worried that it might be the next bank to need government help. The company may soon announce a plan to raise capital, the French newspaper Le Figaro said, without citing a source.
The agreement on Capitol Hill on the terms of the bailout package failed to lift the mood in Europe.
“The U.S. bailout doesn’t change some negative short-term factors — that the economic outlook is weak and that the earnings outlook is weak,” said Tammo Greetfeld, a strategist at UniCredit Markets & Investment Banking in Munich. “The key question is can the bailout create enough optimism among investors that they focus on the medium-term improvement and ignore short-term weakness. We’re not there yet, the benefits look to be too far down the road.”
The dollar gained against the euro and the pound, and was stable against the yen.
Stock markets in Asia fell on renewed fears of a global credit crunch, erasing earlier gains that came after the weekend agreement on Capitol Hill.
The Standard and Poor’s/Australian Stock Exchange 200 Index fell 2 percent after rising slightly on Monday morning. The Kospi Index was down 1.3 percent after an early 1.2 percent surge in Seoul.
Bradford & Bingley, the British lender, was seized by the government after the credit crisis shut off financing and competitors refused to buy mortgage loans that customers were struggling to repay.
Banco Santander, the Spanish lender, will pay $1.1 billion to buy Bradford & Bingley branches and deposits, the Treasury said. Santander shares declined 2.8 percent, to 10.61 euros. Shares in UBS, the Swiss bank, fell 7.7 percent.
The stock market in Taiwan was closed on Monday as Typhoon Jangmi passed directly over Taipei. Mainland China’s stock markets in Shanghai and Shenzhen are closed this week as part of a national holiday marking the establishment of China as a Communist country in 1949.
September 29th, 2008 at 6:55 pm
Great Post Medea and Arun, we’re glad to hear you’ll all be out on Wednesday as well, we need everyone out in this crucial time while we can still impact and hold officials to account. There’s an action/media event being planned for Wednesday from Noon-1 @ Farragut Square in NW DC. If you all have affiliates or supporters in town, please let them know. We’re putting out more info ASAP, lets keep up the fight!
October 1st, 2008 at 7:15 pm
Good luck with this. I will be there in spirit. These last eight years have been outrageous. Everyone needs to speak up. Certain individuals should be hanged for traitorous activities. (metaphorically speaking ) You know who they are! We love this country and we are horrified, as are so many, by these events.
October 3rd, 2008 at 2:08 pm
now that they have passed the bill in both houses wre need to send a strong message to washington that it is a bad idea to pass bills that are against the people I think if we (meanning people that are fed up with gov. spending our taxs foolishly) should withdraw our money from banks and investment firms that would get their attention then they might listen, also we could take a day off work to protest ,the income tax they would loose would probably get their attention too. these are just ideas of things we could do I will be watching and listening and eager to let them know the power of the tax payers.
October 7th, 2008 at 1:26 pm
Two hundred years ago the government was horrified when a revolt of taxpayers shook up the system (Shay’s Rebellion). Let’s do it again! How can we start a grass roots organization that people will join and withhold their taxes?? Sign me up!!



"A world newspaper of conscience" alongside Le Monde Diplomatique and the U.K. Guardian. — Danny Schechter





























September 29th, 2008 at 5:55 am
the link for the economist article is going to the wsj article