Change from Below: Dutch Socialists Build a Grassroots Movement
By Aron GuyFrom the November 17, 2008 issue | Posted in International | Email this article
Three days before the presidential election, Dutch Socialist Party member of the European Parliament Kartika Liotard met with the New York City chapter of the Socialist Party USA at the A.J. Muste Institute in lower Manhattan to share her experience of building a widespread grassroots movement.
“People were looking for something different,” said Liotard, who has spent 21 years helping to create a party that is strong on the streets and a winner at the ballot box.
In a small country of 16.5 million people without a substantial left-wing tradition, the Dutch Socialist Party (SP) has more than 60,000 members and is the third-largest and fastest-growing of the Netherlands’ ten parliamentary parties.
Founded in 1972, the SP holds 25 of 150 seats in the Netherlands lower house of parliament, which allocates seats based on the proportion of the popular vote. This is the equivalent of holding about 72 seats in the 435-member U.S. House of Representatives, although the U.S. system of winner-take-all voting would make this much more difficult to achieve. Liotard is one of 27 members of her party elected to represent the Netherlands in the 785-member European Parliament.
Liotard explained that the Dutch SP achieved success by creating an egalitarian socialist movement, built on the experience and practice of its members. Guided by three core concepts of human dignity, equality and solidarity, the party rejected the notion of a top-down socialist movement and insisted on full representation of members’ interests and needs.
“We knew we had to create a new kind of modern socialism,” Liotard said.
The SP is dedicated to the principles of a generous social welfare state and public ownership of key sectors of the economy. In the short-term, its members are working to alleviate the more egregious harms of the capitalist state. At the beginning, two or three SP members would travel to a neighborhood and listen to community concerns. Was there too much garbage on the street? Not enough lights on at night? No facilities for the elderly? Once the needs were identified, the SP would help to organize local people to solve those problems. The SP also cooperated with trade unions, helping during strikes and working to reform labor law.
This strategy eventually led to the election of socialist members at the local and regional level, and by 1996, the SP had its first national representatives in the parliament. The SP began to be identified as the party of the working class, in part by people who felt the older and larger Labor Party no longer represented them. As the SP became more successful, the party made an important decision. SP members in all levels of office would draw an average salary, with any excess money returned to the party. This would give the party more financial resources to address issues of concern to their members.
For example, Liotard said the Dutch SP is leading the way in outlawing the use of asbestos and helping the victims of asbestos-related illnesses — a campaign supported in part by the salaries of SP-elected politicians.
Other sources of funding come from the sliding-scale dues paid to the party by its members. In addition, people donate their time, which means a little money can go a relatively long way.
With success, the SP increased its focus on maintaining a close, transparent relationship with people at the grassroots level. As the largest opposition party in parliament, the SP had a chance to join in the ruling coalition with Christian Democrats and the Labor Party after the 2006 elections, but ultimately decided that the level of compromise was too high.
The “secret,” then, of a dynamic socialist movement turns out to be not so secret after all: intense, local, highly adaptive community organizing done by hard-working people who did not let their small numbers or their failures deter them at first and who so far have not let their growth or electoral success take them away from their base.
Liotard ended her discussion with a grand prediction. “I’ll come back next year and we will be in a huge hall,” she said.
7 Responses to “Change from Below: Dutch Socialists Build a Grassroots Movement”
November 18th, 2008 at 1:00 pm
Being Dutch I can tell you that the SP is a very succesfull grassroots organisation indeed. The problem with a grassroots organisation on the other hand is the risk you run that a lot of the “big” political issues are difficult to agree upon. There can be something like too many people at the helm. You need a organizational HQ.
They are absolutely great at a local level. They help people organise themselves against a decline in services from both local governement and companies, they help people with their taxes and even have their own cheap internetprovider. In local elections, I am often inclined to vote SP.
As to the comment that they are an anti-immigrant chauvinist party. The SP never denied that there are problems with some of the immigrants. But the majority of them is doing fine. And a lot of these very immigrants joined the SP.
As for the chauvinist part, that statement is so unfounded that I won’t even try to comment on it.
November 18th, 2008 at 4:08 pm
2 corrections:
The SP, 50.000 members (not 60.000), has (only) 2 representatives in the European. Parliament. Kartika Liotard is one of 27 the Dutch members who represent the Netherlands in the 785-member European Parliament.
The English website is: http://international.sp.nl
November 19th, 2008 at 5:59 pm
Being also Dutch i can say the SP is a toothless party, that took over the space left by the old social democrats and never do much grassroots activism at all. They want people to vote for them, and that’s it. More of the same
November 19th, 2008 at 6:52 pm
I have to say that I find this article very one sided and on some thing even wrong.
My personal opinion is that the SP is indeed the better Party in parliament, but also because their isn’t much choice on the left side. They only had a change to become larger and more successful because the old Communist Party dissolved itself with a small majority. The gross of the active members went on to the SP that became more successful when they let go their ideology.
Since that time the SP let more and more socialistic principles go. Like in a effort to be in government isn’t any more against NATO and the monarchy. There isn’t also much left of that activism there is talked about in the article. The SP isn’t active as a party in the labour unions and doesn’t do anything in labour rights outside parliament. On strikes and other actions the SP does attend mostly, but that’s it in general. Usually they open a site with their opinions and publish a pamphlet which they spread. When ever there is something the people are upset about, they quickly put on the agenda to make a speech about in parliament. But again, usually that is it. They mostly let the real activism to union or antiwar or other activists.
Locally they were very active in the past. They picked up many things that the former Communist Party used to do, and very well for a time. But nowadays there is almost nothing left of it.
Another thing that draws a wrong picture about the SP is the membership count. You can be a member of the SP in 10 seconds. By just entering your name on the party’s website. Most members are not active and haven’t even done anything political. National their active members are certainly below the 800. Outside the party people think its much bigger, but on the inside it is clear that only a small portion is active. Not that I believe membership count is the thing that matters, its what those active members do for society on which I judge a party. But 50 or 60 000 members really draws a wrong picture.
The SP is absolutely the better party in parliament and definitely does some things rights for the people in the Netherlands. Much more than the other parties in parliament. But this article depicts the SP as something it is not, how sad it may be.
A Dutch activist
November 20th, 2008 at 7:03 am
Also the Netherlands has a very ‘long and intense’ leftwing history.
December 28th, 2008 at 11:06 am
The article does kind of come off as propaganda given there is no alternative view presented.
As a New Yorker I like to get at least a little bit of both sides, unless the other side is so totally
over reported that for instance the Iraq war’s start was, one is left open mouth waiting for alternative. I’m afraid though I try to keep up on news I can’t say I’ve heard much about the Netherlands for a while. Now I do have one side though.

































November 15th, 2008 at 9:56 am
The Dutch Socialist Prty is an anti-immigrant chauvinist party.