The Indypendent
DONATE NOW - URGENT FALL 2009 FUNDRAISING CAMPAIGN
Search All Articles
Get The Indy by Email




Facebook Twitter

Donate

Subscribe

The IndyShop

RSS Available

Why we love The Indy






Sarah Stuteville
Journalism Workshops

Indykids

Posters!

A Threat to Peace
Artwork by The Indypendent Staff

A Threat to Peace - Artwork by The Indypendent

Buy Now! »


Army of None
Artwork by David Hollenbach

Army of None - Artwork by David Hollenbach

Buy Now! »


Community Resources

Change Towards Latin America, Too?

By Daniel Denvir
December 3, 2008 | Posted in Daniel Denvir , IndyBlog | Email this article

There has of recent been a flurry of reports suggesting that Obama change course in Latin America. This is generally a good thing.

The North American Congress on Latin America (NACLA) wrote an insightful analysis. They say that we have a “unique window of opportunity” and note that Obama’s positions on Latin America range from the good to the quite bad:

We face what could be the most important moment in hemispheric relations in nearly a decade. Obama has made it clear that he will move decisively to re-engage with a Latin America that he sees as having been ignored under eight years of Bush. But the Obama campaign was a constant source of contradictions when it came to the Americas: He indicated a willingness to be more open toward Cuba, but reiterated his support for the embargo; he indicated that he supports a humane policy toward undocumented immigrants, but he wants to further militarize the U.S.-Mexico border; he supports human and labor rights in Colombia, but is unambiguous in his support for Plan Colombia and its counterpart in Mexico, the Mérida Initiative. These equivocations indicate that a range of actual policies is possible under Obama, presenting both an opportunity and a challenge: We must push the Obama administration, as well as the national conversation, in a more progressive direction on hemispheric relations. Now is the time to make our voices heard.

In fact, NACLA is working with the Latin American Solidarity Coalition (LASC) to build a nation-wide network to push Obama in a more progressive direction in the region. According to NACLA editor Christy Thornton, “We felt strongly that if we ignore the policy issue, we are ceding the debate to the Beltway think tanks, and we think that the grassroots Left needs to be involved.” Look out for teach-ins in Washington DC, Chicago and the Bay Area starting in February.

And as I have previously noted in this blog, a group of pretty darn (pardon the Palinism) prestigious Latin American studies scholars have encouraged Obama to engage with the new Latin American Left, rather than vilifying it and using extra-legal methods to remove it from power.

And then there is the recent Brookings Institution report. The report merits some attention given that it comes from an institution that is a political anchor of the center-liberal establishment, the sort of group that Obama is likely to listen to. The report has some bright spots, such as encouraging better relations with Cuba and Venezuela. The report goes on, however, to push for the quick passage of a Free Trade Agreement with Colombia—a terrible, horrible, no good, very bad idea.

It is unclear how pushing “free” trade policies, the rejection of which has been the center of Latin American politics for the past two decades, is going to win us any new friends in the region.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
For nine years, The Indypendent has printed truth in the face of power. With political and economic systems faltering, there is an opportunity for real change from the bottom up. But this means having a vibrant independent media. Consider supporting The Indypendent as a monthly sustainer, donating as little as $5 a month. Please visit indypendent.org/donate.

Subscribe to the Indypendent!

Leave a Reply