Mayor Michael Bloomberg is trying to buy re-election to a third term. The city’s economic and media power elites have already anointed him.
Bloomberg is expected to spend about $80 million on his campaign. That’s not even $10 a person. Considering that the mayor is worth about $16 billion, it’s pitiful.
What do the people of New York City get for that $80 million? A pittance. TV attack commercials, robocalls, back-page ads in neighborhood weeklies and glossy, full-color campaign brochures that give mail carriers bad backs and go straight to landfills.
We want a better deal. If he’s going to buy the election, let’s at least get a decent price for it. For the $11.5 billion he has added to his fortune since elected mayor in 2001, we’d be willing to cancel the election and crown him mayor for four more years.
Under Bloomberg, the gap between the rich and everyone else has widened so much that if Manhattan were a country, it might beat out Namibia for the title of the most economically polarized in the world. Developers have packed New York’s skyline with luxury condos. Landlords have driven tenants out of their homes all over the city to jack up rents. The symbol of Bloomberg’s New York is city parks where drinking fountains don’t work, but there are plenty of pushcarts peddling pints of bottled water for $2.
The mayor sees all this as both pragmatic and righteous — what higher purpose could there be than maximizing real-estate values? His vision of the city is turning it into a slightly greener, pro-Israel version of Dubai. If reelected, he will continue to serve the interests of the ultra-rich.
So let him put some real money into buying the election. Let him pay for the value he’s getting.
What could $11.5 billion buy for the people of New York? The Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s annual deficit is now estimated at almost $2 billion. For $6.5 billion, Bloomberg could avert a fare increase and prevent service cuts for the next four years.
The city has a critical housing shortage. For $3.5 billion, he could pay for 35,000 new apartments of affordable housing. This would create thousands of construction jobs and allow many working families to remain in the city.
That would still leave another billion for the schools, and $500 million for job programs, alternative energy and more. We could restore the $4 million cut from AIDS programs last year or reopen the public-housing senior centers closed to save $18 million. Bloomberg, who touts himself as the consummate expert manager who only wants the best for the city, found those programs too costly — while he was giving the Yankees and Mets almost $1 billion in subsidies to build new stadiums where only Bernie Madoff can afford front-row seats.
Many people think Bloomberg is a “liberal” because he’s not as blatantly racist as former Mayor Rudolph Giuliani and not as fanatically anti-gay as the national Republicans. Well, if a gay black investment banker wants to buy a $3.4 million condo on the Greenwich Village waterfront, the mayor would roll out the red carpet. But if Keisha the teenage butch wants to hang out on Christopher Street because it’s safer to be herself and easier to meet girls there than in Brownsville, she’s part of a troublemaking element that must be stamped out.
Bloomberg is not a liberal. He’s a devout plutocrat. He strongly opposes raising taxes on the rich, even to avert a massive subway-fare increase. Instead, he wants to raise the city’s sales tax. So a struggling single mother would have to kick in an extra quarter to get her kid a $50 pair of sneakers, but millionaires wouldn’t have to pay a penny more in income taxes.
“We want the rich from around this country to move here. We love the rich people,” he said on his radio show in March. “I don’t know what ‘fair’ means. You can argue that if you make more money, you deserve more money.”
Yes, $11.5 billion would be a big hit on the mayor’s personal fortune. It would knock him from 17th to 110th on Forbes magazine’s list of the 400 richest Americans. He’d be as impecunious as Ross Perot.
Bloomberg would have to scrape by on a paltry $4.5 billion — the same fortune he had in 2001, before he took office. But he could console himself with the knowledge that he spent his money on building a better city for all New Yorkers, instead of merely pumping out endless rivers of propaganda claiming that he’s done so.



BILL TO BLOOMBERG TO HELP SAVE THE CITY:
$2,590,000,000 – Cover CUNY budget for a year while also paying tuition for all CUNY undergraduate students
$1,800,000,000 – Pay off MTA’s deficit, preventing the fare hike
$4,300,000,000 – Add 43,000 units of affordable housing
$10,000,000 – Restore proposed cuts to AIDS programs
$1,000,000,000 – Cover cost of proposed sales tax increase
$28,200,000 – Restore proposed library cuts
$1,300,000,000 – Give food stamp recipients an extra $1,000 for 2009
$471,800,000 – New laptops for city’s 1.1 million public school students
TOTAL= $11,500,000,000

For generations of New Yorkers, a college education at the City University of New York (CUNY) has been the path to a better life. But with the cost of higher education soaring while the economy plummets, few are in a position to do more to shore up the dream of a college education for the children of working class New Yorkers than Michael Bloomberg. If only the self-styled “education mayor” would put his money where his mouth is:
Bloomberg could personally cover the $2,800 annual tuition of the 81,538 students enrolled at CUNY’s six community colleges for $228,306,400.
Seventy-six percent of CUNY’s community college students come from households that earn less than $40,000 per year.
For another $28, 538,300, Bloomberg could cover the $350 tuition increase that is being proposed to take effect next fall at CUNY community colleges.
Bloomberg could cover the $4,600 annual tuition of CUNY’s 131,755 senior college students for $606,073,000.
Bloomberg could restore free tuition (which existed at CUNY from 1848-1976) for a year for all 213,293 CUNY undergraduates for $834,379,400.
Bloomberg could cover CUNY’s proposed 2009-2010 operating budget for $2.59 billion.
Numbers based on CUNY’s Fall 2008 enrollment figures.
— JOHN TARLETON
By Alex Kane
Mayor Bloomberg’s key rationale for scrapping term limits and thus allowing him to run again was that he was best able to steer the economy through crisis.
“The bottom line is we face some tough times. I’d be honored to run again and if I’m voted [in] again, I’d be honored to serve,” Bloomberg said in October 2008, a month before the City Council, in a 29 to 22 vote, gave him the go-ahead to run for a third term. “This is a chance to continue the direction the city has been going in.”
He has a point. Bloomberg’s stewardship of New York City’s economy has been good — for Wall Street plutocrats and rich developers. According to census figures released in August 2008, the richest fifth in Manhattan made nearly 40 times more than the poorest fifth in 2005: $351,333 compared to $8,855.
Bloomberg’s civil liberties record is excellent as well — for the NYPD, whose repressiveness has increased under Bloomberg. Hundreds of thousands of people of color continue to be racially profiled by the NYPD, and the police’s conduct at the Republican National Convention 2004 has thus far resulted in the city paying more than a million dollars to settle lawsuits from illegally arrested protesters.
Anyhow, let’s just look at the numbers:
$16 billion: Bloomberg’s net worth in March 2009, according to business publication Forbes. In 2008, he was worth $20 billion.
$4.5 billion: Bloomberg’s net worth in 2001, the year he took office, according to Forbes.
$14,872: Annual income (pdf) of someone working 40 hours a week at minimum wage, 52 weeks per year.
#1: Bloomberg tops the list as the richest person in New York
Over 8,000: The number of homeless families with children who sleep in city-run shelters each night; the highest ever recorded.
6: Number of residences around the world the mayor owns — upstate New York, Colorado, Florida, Bermuda, London and the Upper East Side of Manhattan.
474: Number of homeless families moved into housing from municipal shelters in fiscal year 2008. There has been a sharp drop off since Bloomberg policy effectively cut off the homeless from federal housing aid in late 2004. In fiscal year 2004, almost 6,000 homeless families were moved into housing from shelters.
$400: Amount per night to stay at the Four Seasons Hotel in London, where Bloomberg puts up his aides.
5: Percent of affordable housing that will be available as part of Bloomberg’s rezoning of 125th Street, compared with the promised but flawed number 46 percent.
$850 million: Amount of taxpayer investments for the new Yankee Stadium.
$165 million: Combined amount shelled out by New York City and State taxpayers for CitiField, the Mets’ new stadium.
1: Number of parks in the Bronx operating by the opening day of the new Yankee Stadium to compensate for lost park land it was built on.
943: Library jobs to be cut under Bloomberg’s proposed 2010 budget.
$83 million: Amount in budget cuts proposed for 2010 to the Administration for Child Services, even as reports of abuse and neglect increase.
86,705: Number of people stopped by NYPD in 2001, the last year of the Giuliani administration. 73 percent stopped were Black or Latino.
531,159: Number of individuals stopped by NYPD in 2008, 80 percent of whom were black or Latino.
1,806: People arrested by NYPD during the Republican National Convention in 2004.
90: Percent of people arrested during the Republican National Convention who saw their charges dropped.




Comments
nice !
Wishnia For Mayor.
I love this article, I'm sending it to everyone I know. Thank you Steven!
Very well said.
Bloomberg needs to either go, or grow up and kick some of the cash back to the people.
Mr. Angry
angrynyer.com
Yes. I'd like to add, take the money and remove Mayoral control.
For a good overview of the CUNY (as touched by numbers/$ in the article), listen to WBAI's CUNY show "CUNY:A Dream Deferred", the show of April 29th, 2009 is still archived (archived or 90 days from show date) at www.wbai.org
The show is a collective of students, some faculty, some former staff and staff. (Disclosure:one of the people doing the show is a family friend.)
On NYPD law suits/settlements: let Bloomberg reimburse the public for what we have paid for police abuse/murders. See the October 22 Coalition Against Police Brutality www.oct22.org (I hope)
The Mayor could pay for CURB CUTS that don't exist on some street corners and repair the others, so wheelchair users can cross the street. see Disabled in Action www.disabledinaction.org
The Mayor could OK and buy taxis so wheelchair users can get a public cab, like in Los Angeles, Boston, and San Francisco.
More on education: if the Mayor does not want to "ask" City Council to close the loophole so schools in NYC can RENT space in unhealthy sites, he can buy safe, clean buildings for NYC school children. At the same time, he can remove the coal burning boilers that still may be in some schools.
The Mayor can reimburse the City for the NO Bid contracts of over $1bn (bn is something I learned this year, for billion) in education contracts.
The Mayor can buy (fill in your own wish/demand list).
The Mayor can also pay for wheelchair accessible voting sites (the law is not especially enforced), and postage on the return envelope for disabled people who have to use absentee ballots to vote. (It's not free any more, and the Mayor and the Bd. of Elections are to blame.
On housing: The mayor can buy cranes -- not the flying kind, we don't need any more metal cranes that fly. The mayor can pay to fix all the housing violations and buy the remaining Mitchell-Lama rental buildings, and buy back the ones now in rent stabilization "slow bleed".
Finally, the mayor can give a guaranteed income to those who can't find jobs. He can give income to those he has the NYPD hassle because they are homeless on the street. AND he CAN PAY THE CHARGES HE WANTS TO CHARGE PEOPLE IN HOMELESS SHELTERS. And feed all who need food in NYC, etc.
I really like the article!!!!
Correction: www.october22.org For October 22 Coalition Against Police Brutality In my eagernesss...
Damn me for being successful. Apparently Mayor B. has reaped the benefits of what our capitalist model has offered. Instead of divvying up what he has earned and shoeing ourselves neo-socialists, how about pleading with the man to take a bow and let another deserving candidate have his or her shot at leadership.
wealthy whatever: reread the article. Nobody cares what you have.
This is a great article--completely on target and exactly what needs to be said: great work. It needs to be widely publicized. I have only one thing to add: Bloomberg IS the swine epidemic.
This is a great article--completely on target and exactly what needs to be said: great work. It needs to be widely publicized. I have only one thing to add: Bloomberg IS the swine epidemic. To the wealthyprick above: if it were your sorry brain and ass dying or homeless or in jail or in one of any other number of ways suffering because of this transparently assinine and inhuman system, you'd probably have something more intelligent to say; your reasoning is as compelling as a Nazi commandante's--congratulations for bilking with lies, greed, and imposture a murderous system; you and your bowing swinepet have reason to be proud.
If you're talking about Bloomberg as a plutocrat, why didn't you mention his 3rd World nation theft of the electorate's power by cancelling term limits, a measure that was passed by public referendum? That self-anointing, authoritarian action was proof enough of what Bloomberg actually is. And he would only have tried that in the general atmosphere of dictatorship created by the Bush administration. Bloomberg knew that the public and the media had been conditioned to accept that when it came to abridging America's democratic institutions, under Bush anything could be done. Cynical and self-serving like Bush, Cheney and their whole D.C. team, Bloomberg has turned NYC over to his chums, the real estate and Wall Street elite. His attitude? If you don't like it, get out.
Bloomberg is running as a Republican. (and my word to type, below, is "blubbers"..)
Bloomberg buys: add advertising on the internet. In a box advert, it says "Bloomberg for mayor" and
below it a little box link for "jobs".
Remember: A Government is just an idea, not a thing. Not the building but the document contains the idea, which runs the machinery of State. When a city loses its legitimacy, when it is no longer supported by the consent of the governed, then it resorts to secrecy and deceit.
SHOCKING NEWS: There are rumblings out in the streets saying Bloomberg has paid off Thompson to stay in the race. We all knew he couldn’t win but this, if true, is a betrayal of trust. Politicians are not to be counted on. There’s a mayoral candidate out there named Roland Rogers who’s refreshing, honest and has the know how to get New York City out of this fiscal mess all of these politicians created. Go to http://www.RR4mayornyc.com and join the campaign for real change
The mainstream media is dismayed every time a leftist president in Latin America asks the people of his country about reelection.
Chávez, Correa and Morales all asked their people about it, all got it passed and then got re-elected. Bloomberg actually went against the will of the people, who had voted against re-election not once but twice. He needed to go to the City Council to get the measure approved.
In this upside down world, the mainstream media doesn't even blink.
Other pro US presidents in Latin America also got re-elected by changing the laws without asking their people. Fujimori in Peru, Alan Garcia in Peru, Cardoso in Brazil, Uribe in Colombia and notably, the Nobel Peace Prize and pro US President of Costa Rica, Oscar Arias.
I bring him up because he did the same as Bloomberg did now: went to congress, got denied re-election. Then went to the Supreme Court, denied once. Changed a couple of judges, went again, and this time, approved.
Whenever candidates are doing what they are supposed to do, the mainstream media will support them.
The so-called "paper of record" is notorious for criticizing other people for seeking re-election, but drools over Bloomberg.
Never questions how the hell he tripled "his" fortune when he is supposedly working full time for the city.
Here is a really nice article from FAIR about the "paper of record" and its changing views on term limits, with links to the 2 editorials published by the NYT less than one year apart.
www.fair.org/blog/2008/10/02/the-new-york-times-real-feelings-on-term-li...
Yeah people can change their minds....
It's a reverse ponzi scheme, period.
Add new comment