Sonia Sotomayor and the Status Quo
By Karen YiMay 28, 2009 | Posted in IndyBlog | Email this article
An unprecedented nomination by President Barack Obama has opened the gates for not only a woman, but a Nuyorican Latina to serve as the 111th Supreme Court Justice. As a daughter of Puerto Rican parents, Judge Sonia Sotomayor’s story from rags to riches and possibly to the highest court of the nation, has sparked pride across Latino communities and a heated debate about identity politics.
Introducing Judge Sotomayor in the East Room of the White House, President Barack Obama said, “Over a distinguished career that spans three decades, Judge Sotomayor has worked at almost every level of our judicial system, providing her with a depth of experience and a breadth of perspective that will be invaluable as a Supreme Court justice.”
Judge Sotomayor responded, “I strive never to forget the real world consequences of my decisions on individuals, businesses and government.”
From growing up in a public housing project near Yankee Stadium in the South Bronx to graduating from two of the nations most prestigious universities — Princeton and Yale — for some, Sotomayor has reinvigorated the idea that the American Dream is indeed alive and kicking.
“I think it speaks to what people can become in this country; regardless of where the family is from, they have opportunities in this country,” said Cesar Perales, president and general counsel of Latino Justice PRLDEF. “It has interesting historical grounds,” he added, “people that left Puerto Rico were the poorest of the poor that could not survive, and today are beginning to play important roles that actually affect the lives of the people in Puerto Rico.”
Yet statistics show that Sotomayor’s success story is a rarity amongst the Latino experience. Fast-forwarding 30 years from Sotomayor’s Yale graduation in 1979, and Latinos are still facing educational disparities. Comprising 25 percent of students in grades K-12, Latinos have the highest high school dropout rates and are half as likely to complete college as white undergraduates. Recent numbers from the National Center for Children in Poverty show that more than 60 percent of all Latino children live in low-income households.
While Sotomayor’s success against provides a model for Latino youth, it also underscores the ongoing struggle for racial equality. Angelo Falcón, co-founder and president of the National Institute for Latino Policy and assistant adjunct professor at Columbia University said Sotomayor is a product of “community struggles to open up those institutions.” He added, “Her struggle, her story of growing up in a housing project, all those things came about as a result of struggle — even the struggle for fair housing.”
Still awaiting confirmation from the U.S. Senate, Sotomayor would replace Justice David Souter who announced his retirement at the end of the court term. Appointed by President George H.W. Bush, Justice Souter firmly established himself among the court’s liberals. With a hard to characterize judicial record, Sotomayor seem to be right in line with her would-be predecessor.
As the first Latina Justice Sotomayor will make history, but will she leave a politically progressive mark on the court?
“I think that perhaps Obama missed an opportunity here,” said Marjorie Cohn, president of the National Lawyers Guild and a professor at Thomas Jefferson School of Law on May 29 on Democracy Now! “I’m thrilled that there will be the first Latina on the Supreme Court,” said Cohn, “but I really would have liked to have seen a real progressive counterweight to radical rightists on the court.”
“She basically, politically, maintains the status quo of the court,” said Falcón, who describes her as “pragmatic, centrist, with very moderate positions.”
The symbolism and importance of Sotomayor needs to serve as a way “motivate people to organize and continue to press as opposed to feeling comfortable that we have arrived,” said Falcón. “With all the hype you got to get defensive around something like this,” he said, “when you take an overall picture of the situation within the Latino community there’s a long way to go.”
4 Responses to “Sonia Sotomayor and the Status Quo”
May 30th, 2009 at 10:42 pm
Slavery was a double standard - the trail of Tears was a double standard - Jim Crow was a double standard - the Grandfather Clause was a a double standard - the genocide of Native America was a double standard - the overthrow of Latin American Governments was a double standard - No Irish Need Apply signs was a double standard - the KKK was a double standard - The Red Scare was a double-standard - support for Israel is a double standard - redlining is a double standard - police brutality is a double standard - Sean Bell was a double standard - Death threats by American Nazis on Obama are a double standard - Capitalism is a double standard - Our consumption of a fourth of the world’s resources a day is what a quadruple standard - Laws against gay marriage are a double standard - Matthew Shepard was a double standard - Women not able to vote until 1920 was a double standard - Women being paid 78 cents for every man’s dollar is a double standard - South Asians being stopped at airports is a double standard - I could go on and on but you get the point…
When conservatives shout for blind justice they usually mean blind to history.
May 31st, 2009 at 7:40 pm
As a middle-aged, middle class white guy, I can only shake my head when I read something like the post above from “Reaganite Republican Resistance”. It’s say far more about what it means to lead a life of unexamined privilege than it does about Sonia Sotomayor. For more about the meaning of “La Raza”, see this post from Al Giordano of Narco News:
http://narcosphere.narconews.com/thefield/understanding-la-raza
June 1st, 2009 at 7:55 pm
Yes, everything that Nicholas Powers says about the double standards that define our society is absolutely true, but the main point is that Sonia Sotomayor has a proven track record–as a “pragmatic, centrist, with very moderate positions.”
Anyone who expects her to be in the mold of an Earl Warren, Thurgood Marshall, William Douglas, or William Brennan is deluding herself or himself.
What exactly is wrong with “liberals” and “radicals” these days? Is knee-jerk defensiveness to each and every nutty attack from the right conditioned into them, or is it “in their genes”? What are they afraid of? Is it fear that an honest critical appraisal of Judge Sotomayor’s middle-of-the-road record will be perceived as breaking ranks with the “cause”?
On the contrary–failure to make such a critical appraisal is breaking ranks with the cause!

































May 30th, 2009 at 12:12 pm
Unless you are delusional, Sotomayer is a racist, as are all members of the treasonous La Raza -by definition- who’s motto is “For our race everything- for others, nothing”.
Clearly Eric Holder has some racial hangups and agenda too… as does Obama, since his behavior betrays a wierd pro-Kenyan grudge against the British… and he’s the one who nominated all these kooks.
What happened to the idea of a colorblind society? Team Obama define their world in racial terms all the time- and unlike any white people I know. I wouldn’t want to be judged by any of them after what I’ve heard come out of their own mouths- they sound like Jesse Jackson.
If Obama is going to go on with his “justice” agenda largely based upon race- the double standards need to stop, and NOW.
http://reaganiterepublicanresistance.blogspot.com/