The Indypendent
DONATE NOW - URGENT FALL 2009 FUNDRAISING CAMPAIGN
Search All Articles

Get The Indy by Email




Facebook Twitter

Donate

Subscribe

The IndyShop

RSS Available

Why we love The Indy






Sarah Stuteville
Journalism Workshops

Indykids

Posters!

A Threat to Peace
Artwork by The Indypendent Staff

A Threat to Peace - Artwork by The Indypendent

Buy Now! »


Army of None
Artwork by David Hollenbach

Army of None - Artwork by David Hollenbach

Buy Now! »


Community Resources

Muslim In and Out: A Review of The Islamist: Why I Became an Islamic Fundamentalist, What I Saw Inside, and Why I Left

By Eleanor J. Bader
From the June 5, 2009 issue | Posted in Books , Culture , Reviews | Email this article

The Islamist: Why I Became an Islamic Fundamentalist, What I Saw Inside, and Why I Left
By Ed Husain
Penguin Books, 2009

When Ed Husain’s The Islamist first appeared in British bookstores in 2007, fundamentalist Muslims condemned their former comrade-turned-critic, calling him a traitor. This is not surprising, since Husain presents the groups he was involved with, including the Young Muslim Organization (YMO) and Hizb ut-Tahrir, in less than flattering terms.

At the same time, Husain has resisted becoming the darling of the Right. He is openly critical of Israel and Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Leiberman and has criticized Western imperialism, the Iraq War and the push for more troops in Afghanistan. As the founder of the Quilliam Foundation, a year-old think tank named for the man who opened Britain’s first mosque in 1889, he hopes to unite those who oppose religious violence and extremism.

The Islamist is part memoir, part political tract and part explication of Islam. It begins in 1975, with Husain’s birth into a middle-class London family. His immigrant parents were largely assimilated, maintaining their faith while simultaneously participating in civic life. Husain was sent to a public elementary school where he recalls being treated fairly. By junior high, however, gangs had become prominent and Husain switched schools; his education now included exposure to religion teachers pushing “the establishment of Allah’s law in Allah’s land.”

Husain found this concept thrilling. For one, it enraged his parents. For another, it allowed him to plug into a ready-made community, something all teenagers crave. Within months, he joined the Young Muslim Organization and began to learn about community organizing, from leafleting to public speaking. He was a natural — charismatic, devoted and passionate.

While his studies suffered, he didn’t care, and he became an outspoken promoter of political Islam. By age 16 his entire social circle was Islamist, convinced that Islam trumped other faiths. “Partial Muslims,” like his parents, were continually derided.

ILLUSTRATION: LOUJOE.COM
ILLUSTRATION: LOUJOE.COM

He began reading fundamentalists like Syed Qutb and by the time he enrolled in Tower Hamlets College was calling Islam “the final solution,” oblivious to the phrase’s Nazi origins. He encouraged other students to practice “true Islam,” publicly berating women who failed to dress modestly. “Like me,” he writes, “most of the students at college had no real bond with mainstream Britain … Islamism provided us with a purpose and a place in life.”

By the mid-1990s, splits in YMO catapulted Husain into Hizb ut-Tahrir, a group led by Omar Bakri. Bakri spoke about the murder of Bosnians and hyped Husain up on the idea of uniting Muslim armies under a single state, the caliphate. Democracy, Bakri told Husain, was haram, forbidden, because it was human-crafted. “Only Allah can rule,” Bakri counseled.

Jihad, the caliphate, Sharia Law — indeed, Bakri’s entire oppositional stance — captivated Husain. Then, reality bit. A fight between a Hizb member and someone considered a “Christian nigger” ended with the latter’s death. The murder shook Husain. “I felt unremitting guilt,” he explains, suddenly understanding attacks on “infidels” as the logical outcome of Hizb philosophy.

As he slowly extricated himself from the group, he became immersed in classical Islam and was shaken even further. The Prophet Mohammed’s words, “Beware of extremism in religion; for it was extremism in religion that destroyed those who went before you,” haunted him and prompted him to study further. Coupled with 9/11 and the 2005 London subway bombings, this study eventually led Husain to recant his former ideology and get funding for Quilliam.

Husain’s analysis and personal example deserve a fair hearing both within and outside the Muslim community. His non-literal interpretation of scripture, his belief in women’s equality, and his rejection of violence are wise responses to Islamist extremism. While I disagree with his push to ban the YMO and the Hizb — a position more likely to increase their appeal than stifle it — The Islamist is both fascinating and instructive.

Share and Enjoy:
  • TwitThis
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
For nine years, The Indypendent has printed truth in the face of power. With political and economic systems faltering, there is an opportunity for real change from the bottom up. But this means having a vibrant independent media. Consider supporting The Indypendent as a monthly sustainer, donating as little as $5 a month. Please visit indypendent.org/donate.

Subscribe to the Indypendent!

One Response to “Muslim In and Out: A Review of The Islamist: Why I Became an Islamic Fundamentalist, What I Saw Inside, and Why I Left”

sam Says:

the problem with this review, is that it glosses over the fact that Ed (not even his real name) Hussain and his subsequent foundation (Quilliam) based off of his book are now hard-core and vociferous British and American neo-con cheerleaders.

He has:

1. expressed support for the invasion and occupation of Iraq.
2. Said there were too many “non-white” people in the UK.
3. Actively supported bringing in Dutch hatemonger Wilders into the UK while banning “extremists”
4. Demanded that Muslims recognize and support the state of Israel
5. Wanted a ban on a new mosque being built in East London

there is a LOT more that can be said, but the ULTIMATE indictment of both his book and the foundation based off of it is that it is entirely funded by British taxpayers:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article5549138.ece

at at time when British politicians are under fire for fleecing the public for personal expenses both Mr. Hussain and Mr. Nawaz are taking taxpayer funds for a foundation with ZERO support amongst the community in whose name they claim to speak and have had numerous questions raised about whose interest they are really serving.

Leave a Reply