The Indypendent
DONATE NOW - URGENT FALL 2009 FUNDRAISING CAMPAIGN
Search All Articles
Get The Indy by Email




Facebook Twitter

Donate

Subscribe

The IndyShop

RSS Available

Why we love The Indy






Sarah Stuteville
Journalism Workshops

Indykids

Posters!

A Threat to Peace
Artwork by The Indypendent Staff

A Threat to Peace - Artwork by The Indypendent

Buy Now! »


Army of None
Artwork by David Hollenbach

Army of None - Artwork by David Hollenbach

Buy Now! »


Community Resources

Bacon as a Weapon of Mass Destruction

By Arun Gupta
From the July 24, 2009 issue | Posted in Arun Gupta , National | Email this article

By Arun Gupta Illustrations by Jennifer Lew and Ryan Dunsmuir

To see Gupta discuss “Bacon as a Weapon of Mass Destruction” August 3 on Democracy Now, see here.

Among my fondest childhood memories is savoring a strip of perfectly cooked bacon that had just been dragged through a puddle of maple syrup. It was an illicit pleasure; varnishing the fatty, salty, smoky bacon with sweet arboreal sap felt taboo. How could such simple ingredients produce such riotous flavors?

 

That was then. Today, you don’t need to tax yourself applying syrup to bacon — McDonald’s does it all for you with the McGriddle. It conveniently takes the filling for an Egg McMuffin, an egg, American cheese and pork product, and nestles it in a pancake-like biscuit suffused with genuine fake-maple syrup flavor.

 

The McGriddle is just one moment in an era of extreme food combinations — a moment in which bacon plays a starring role from high cuisine to low. There’s bacon ice cream; bacon-infused vodka; deep-fried bacon; chocolate-dipped bacon; bacon-wrapped hot dogs filled with cheese (which are fried and then battered and fried again); brioche bread pudding smothered in bacon sauce; there’s hard-boiled eggs coated in mayonnaise encased in bacon — called, appropriately, the “heart attack snack”; bacon salt; bacon doughnuts, cupcakes and cookies; bacon mints; “baconnaise,” which Jon Stewart described as “for people who want to get heart disease but [are] too lazy to actually make bacon”; Wendy’s “Baconnator,” six strips of bacon mounded atop a half-pound cheeseburger, which sold 25 million in its first eight weeks; and the outlandish bacon explosion, a barbecued meat brick composed of two pounds of bacon wrapped around two pounds of sausage.

 

It’s easy to dismiss this gonzo gastronomy as typical American excess best followed with a Lipitor chaser. Behind the proliferation of bacon offerings, however, is a confluence of government policy, factory farming, the boom in fast food and manipulation of consumer taste that has turned bacon into a weapon of mass destruction.

 

While bacon’s harmful effects were once limited to individual consumers, its production in vast porcine cities has become an environmental disaster. The system of industrialized hog (and beef and poultry) farming that has developed over the last 40 years turns out to be ideal for breeding novel strains of deadly pathogens such as the current pandemic of swine flu. If a new killer virus appears, like the Spanish Flu that killed tens of millions after World War I, factory farms will have played a central role in its genesis.

 

Concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) churn out cheap but flavorless meat. However, for the CAFOs to exist there must be demand for the product. That’s where the industrial food sector comes in. Chains like McDonald’s, Chili’s, Taco Bell, Applebee’s and Pizza Hut approach the tasteless, limp factory beef, pork and chicken as a blank canvas with which to create highly enticing, even addictive, foods by pumping it full of fat, salt, sugar, chemicals and flavorings.

 

The chains lard on bacon in particular as a high-profit method of adding an item that has a “high flavor profile,” a “one-of-a-kind product that has no taste substitute.” According to David Kessler, author of The End of Overeating, a standard joke in the restaurant chain industry goes, “When in doubt, throw cheese and bacon on it.” In essence, the chains conjure up endless variations on the McGriddle that itself is the mass-produced version of the maple syrup-soaked bacon strip from our childhood.

 

Thus, the crisis of factory farming becomes its own solution through the use of the industrially produced bacon. We know our industrial food system is killing the planet and killing us with heart disease, diabetes and cancer, but how can we resist when it tastes oh-so-good?

 

Our current food system has its roots in the Dust Bowl and the Great Depression. With thousands of farming families fleeing the land, the Roosevelt administration dispensed credit and established price supports to stabilize the agricultural sector. The policy worked, but inadvertently created large grain surpluses. The problem of surpluses was temporarily alleviated by the demand created by the total mobilization of the state and nation during World War II. But after the war, the question of what to do with the excess production became more pressing.

 

The answer was to dump the surpluses, first on a devastated Europe, then during the Korean War and finally as “humanitarian aid” to Third World countries.

 

In the name of national food security, the U.S. government subsidized farmers to produce more food than Americans could eat, and to dump that surplus as a weapon in the Cold War. This policy favored economy of scale and technological innovation to increase yields, because managing overproduction was more effective if the farm sector was reduced and subsidies targeted at large-scale monoculture producers rather than farmers who produced a variety of goods or had small plots of land.

 

While the U.S. farm population had been shrinking since the late 18th century, when it was 90 percent of the general population, in 1940, on the eve of the U.S. entry into World War II, some 18 percent of Americans were still farmers. By 1970 farmers accounted for only 4.6 percent of the populace because small farms could not compete with government-subsidized agribusiness.

 

It’s government policy that allowed CAFOs to come into being. Karl Polanyi argued decades ago in The Great Transformation that “laissez-faire was planned.” In other words, government regulation of land, labor and finance creates the conditions for free-market capitalism to operate.

 

The post-WWII period witnessed a series of agricultural revolutions that have been exported around the world, starting in the 1950s with the U.S.-led “Green Revolution” in cereal grains. In the 1970s, the “Livestock Revolution” went global. And the 1980s saw the “Blue Revolution” — factory farming of fish and seafood. Over the past few decades, global meat production has increased by more than 500 percent.

 

In Fast Food Nation, Eric Schlosser recounts the 1960s rise of Iowa Beef Packers (IBP), which revolutionized the beef industry. IBP came into being because it was able to exploit heavily subsidized water, fuel, land and grain for cattle feed; a national transportation infrastructure; and anti-union laws.

 

IBP’s innovation was to combine slaughterhouses with enormous cattle feedlots. In the slaughterhouses, IBP used Fordist production techniques to de-skill meat cutting, paid low wages and busted unions to drive prices down and rake in profits. Faced with relentless low-cost competition from IBP, other meatpackers had to adapt or die. By 1971, notes Schlosser, the last Chicago stockyard shut down. (The modern poultry industry, typified by Tyson Foods and Perdue Farms, got its start during World War II with the help of price controls and government-created demand.)

 

In the 1970s Smithfield Foods revolutionized hog production. According to a Rolling Stone 2006 expose, Smithfield “controls every stage of production, from the moment a hog is born until the day it passes through the slaughterhouse. [It] imposed a new kind of contract on farmers: The company would own the living hogs; the contractors would raise the pigs and be responsible for managing the hog shit and disposing of dead hogs. The system made it impossible for small hog farmers to survive — those who could not handle thousands and thousands of pigs were driven out of business.”

 

In the 1950s there were 2.1 million hog farmers in the United States with an average of 31 hogs each. As of 2007 there were just 79,000 hog farmers left, averaging over 1,000 hogs each. A single Smithfield subsidiary in Utah holds half-a-million hogs and produces more shit every day than all the residents of Manhattan.

 

Rolling Stone’s stunning report describes the lakes of manure that surround pig factories as Pepto Bismol colored because of the “interactions between the bacteria and blood and afterbirths and stillborn piglets and urine and excrement and chemicals and drugs.” (Vegetarians who think they are unaffected by this toxic fecal frappe should think again: The sludge is often used to “fertilize” crops that may find their way to your table.)

 

Beef, poultry and hog CAFOs could not exist without large-scale environmental devastation. Governments at every level exempt these operations from laws and regulations covering air pollution, water pollution and solid waste disposal. They are also largely free from proper bio-surveillance, that is, public monitoring to detect, track and report on the outbreak of diseases.

 

Mike Davis, author of The Monster at Our Door, writes that scrutiny of the interface between human and animal diseases is “primitive, often non-existent” because companies such as Smithfield, IBP and Tyson would have to spend money on surveillance and upgrade conditions at their hellish animal factories.

 

For Smithfield, devastating the environment is just a minor cost of doing business. In Virginia in 1997 the company was slapped with a $12.6 million fine for 6,982 violations of the Clean Water Act — an average of $1,800 per violation.

 

Rolling Stone paints a grim picture of what goes on inside a hog CAFO: “Sows are artificially inseminated and fed and delivered of their piglets in cages so small they cannot turn around. Forty fully grown 250-pound male hogs often occupy a pen the size of a tiny apartment. They trample each other to death. There is no sunlight, straw, fresh air or earth. The floors are slatted to allow excrement to fall into a catchment pit under the pens, but many things besides excrement can wind up in the pits: afterbirths, piglets accidentally crushed by their mothers, old batteries, broken bottles of insecticide, antibiotic syringes, stillborn pigs …”

 

Factory farms are a hotspot of new infectious diseases. According to a former chief of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Special Pathogens Branch, “Intensive agricultural methods often mean that a single, genetically homogeneous species is raised in a limited area, creating a perfect target for emerging diseases, which proliferate happily among a large number of like animals in close proximity.”

 

In his book Bird Flu, Michael Greger, MD, writes, “Factory farms are considered such breeding grounds for disease that much of the animals’ metabolic energy is spent just staying alive under such filthy, crowded, stressful conditions; normal physiological processes like growth are put on the back burner. Reduced growth rates in such hostile conditions cut into profits, but so would reducing the overcrowding. Antibiotics, then, became another crutch the industry can use to cut corners and cheat nature.”

 

But what happens when a poultry factory is doused with antivirals? According to Greger, “Say there’s a one in a billion chance of an influenza virus developing resistance to amantadine [an antiviral drug]. Odds are, any virus we would come in contact with would be sensitive to the drug. But each infected bird poops out more than a billion viruses every day. The rest of their viral colleagues may be killed by the amantadine, but that one resistant strain of virus will be selected to spread and burst forth from the chicken farm, leading to widespread viral resistance and emptying our arsenal against bird flu.”

 

To compound the problem, “the raising of swine is increasingly centralized in huge operations, often adjacent to poultry farms and migratory bird habits,” writes Mike Davis. These operations often abut cities, meaning the “superurbanization of the human population … has been paralleled by an equally dense urbanization of its meat supply.” These elements have produced an interspecies blender that is spitting out new viruses at an alarming rate, like the current swine flu bug.

 

While CAFOs excel in creating novel pathogens, they also churn out mountains of cheap but tasteless meat. So there is another important component to our deadly food system, and that’s the science and industrial manufacturing of highly processed foods.

 

Just as factory farms depended on government policies and regulations to exist, the processed food industry could not exist without industrial farming. In 1966 McDonald’s switched from using about 175 different suppliers of fresh potatoes to J.R. Simplot Company’s frozen French fry. Within a decade, notes Eric Schlosser, McDonald’s went from 725 outlets nationwide to more than 3,000.

 

Tyson did the same with chicken, which was seen as a healthy alternative to red meat. It teamed up with McDonald’s to launch the Chicken McNugget nationwide in 1983. Within one month McDonald’s became the number two chicken buyer in the country, behind KFC. The McNugget also transformed chicken processing. By 2000, Tyson made most of its money from processed chicken, selling its products to 90 of the 100 largest restaurant chains. As for the health benefits, Chicken McNuggets have twice as much fat per ounce as a McDonald’s hamburger.

 

The entire food industry, perhaps best described as “eatertainment,” has refined the science of taking the cheap commodities pumped out by agribusiness and processing them into foodstuffs that are downright addictive. Food is far more than mere fuel intake. Food is marketed as a salve for our emotional and psychological ills, and dining out as a social activity, a cultural outlet and entertainment.

 

To get us in the door (or to pick up their product at the supermarket), food companies stoke our gustatory senses. The food has to be visually appealing, have the right feel, texture and smell. And most of all, it has to taste good. To that end, writes Kessler in The End of Overeating, the food industry has homed in on the “three points of the compass” — fat, salt and sugar.

 

One anonymous food-industry executive told Kessler, “Higher sugar, fat and salt make you want to eat more.” The executive admitted food is designed to be “highly hedonic,” and that the food industry is “the manipulator of the consumers’ minds and desires.”

 

Referencing human and lab animal studies, Kessler shows how varying concentrations and combinations of fat and sugar intensify production of neurochemicals, much the same way cocaine does. One professor of psychiatry explains that people self-administer food in search of “different stimulating and sedating effects,” — much like a “speedball,” which combines cocaine and heroin.

 

Kessler deconstructs numerous restaurant chain foods as nothing more than layers of fat, salt and sugar. Take the McGriddle: It starts with a “cake” of refined wheat flour (essentially a sugar), pumped with vegetable shortening, three kinds of sugar and salt. This cradles an egg, cheese and bacon topped by another cake. Thus, the McGriddle, from the bottom up, is fat, salt, sugar, fat and salt in the egg, then fat and salt in the cheese, fat and salt in the bacon, finished off with fat, salt and sugar. And this doesn’t indicate how highly processed the sandwich is. McDonald’s bacon, a presumably simple product, lists 18 separate ingredients, many of them used multiple times.

 

The success of the McGriddle and the Baconator has inspired an arms-race-like escalation among chain restaurants. Burger King’s French Toast Sandwich is nearly identical to the McGriddle. In 2004 Hardee’s went thermonuclear with its 1,420-calorie “Monster Thickburger,” laden with 107 grams of fat. And people are gobbling them up.

 

Perhaps you feel smug (and nauseated) by all this because you are a vegetarian, a vegan or a locavore, or you only eat organic and artisanal foods. Don’t. Americans are in the thrall of the food industry. More than half the population eats fast food at least once a week; 92 percent eat fast food every month; and “every month about 90 percent of American children between the ages of three and nine visit a McDonald’s,” states Schlosser.

 

The food industry has successfully appropriated the childhood creation of bacon dripping with syrup and repackaged it as a product that provides us with a coveted but deadly hit of salt, fat and sugar.

 

We know this food is killing us slowly with diseases like diabetes, heart disease and cancer. But we cannot stop, because we are addicts, and the food industry is the pusher. Even if we could opt out completely (which is almost impossible), it is still our land being ravaged, our water and air being poisoned, our dollars subsidizing the destruction, our public health at risk from bacterial and viral plagues.

 

Changing our perilous food system means making choices — not to shop for a greener planet, but to collectively dismantle factory farming, giant food corporations and the political system that allows them to exist. It’s a big order, but it’s the only option left on the menu.

 

This story was originally published on alternet.org.

 

 

McGriddles® Cakes:

Water, enriched bleached wheat flour (bleached flour, niacin, iron, thiamine mononitrate, riboflavin, folic acid), sugar, dextrose, palm oil, soybean oil, brown sugar, leavening (sodium acid pyrophosphate, sodium bicarbonate, monocalcium phosphate), natural and artificial flavors (contain milk, soy), rice flour, whey  powder, salt, modified tapioca starch, buttermilk powder, color (caramel), soybean lecithin, carnauba wax, preservatives (TBHQ, citric acid).

 

Scrambled Eggs (2):

Pasteurized whole eggs with sodium acid pyrophosphate, citric acid and monosodium phosphate (added to preserve color), nisin (preservative). Prepared with Liquid Margarine: Liquid soybean oil, water, partially hydrogenated soybean oil, salt, hydrogenated cottonseed oil, soy lecithin, mono-and diglycerides, sodium benzoate and potassium sorbate (preservatives), artificial flavor, citric acid, vitamin A palmitate, beta carotene (color).

 

Processed Cheese Slice: Cheese (milk, modified milk ingredients, bacterial culture, salt, calcium chloride, microbial enzyme, lipase), modified milk ingredients, water, sodium citrate and/or sodium phosphate, salt, potassium sorbate, citric acid, colour, soy lecithin.

 

Bacon: Cured with water, salt, smoke flavoring, sodium phosphate, seasoning [gum acacia, smoke flavor, maltodextrin, hydrolyzed corn protein, natural flavor (vegetable source), autolyzed yeast extract, hydrolyzed corn, wheat, and soy protein, modified cornstarch, contains less than 2% of disodium guanylate, disodium inosinate, natural flavor (vegetable source), salt, succinic acid, xanthan gum], sodium erythorbate, sodium nitrite.

 

 

Sources: fatfreekitchen.com, nutritiondata.com, nutrition.mcdonalds.com

 

To view the pdf of this article, click here.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
For nine years, The Indypendent has printed truth in the face of power. With political and economic systems faltering, there is an opportunity for real change from the bottom up. But this means having a vibrant independent media. Consider supporting The Indypendent as a monthly sustainer, donating as little as $5 a month. Please visit indypendent.org/donate.

Subscribe to the Indypendent!

25 Responses to “Bacon as a Weapon of Mass Destruction”

Gross Says:

Is there a greater indictment of factory farming than the gross amounts of fecal matter and other body systems waste this:

Rolling Stone paints a grim picture of what goes on inside a hog CAFO: “Sows are artificially inseminated and fed and delivered of their piglets in cages so small they cannot turn around. Forty fully grown 250-pound male hogs often occupy a pen the size of a tiny apartment. They trample each other to death. There is no sunlight, straw, fresh air or earth. The floors are slatted to allow excrement to fall into a catchment pit under the pens, but many things besides excrement can wind up in the pits: afterbirths, piglets accidentally crushed by their mothers, old batteries, broken bottles of insecticide, antibiotic syringes, stillborn pigs …”

Though the writer warns against vegan/vegetarian smugness, and I think vegans/veggies have a role in exposing this crime against the environment and humanity, I do admit to feeling smug.

Bal Patil Says:

Dear Mr.Gupta,

Your hardhitting article on the Alternet: Gonzo Gastronomy: How the Food Industry Has Made Bacon a Weapon of Mass Destruction must be read by every vegetarian and non-vegetarian. As a Jain activist for Jain minority rights in India, and a journalist of half-century standing, I found it very pertinent. I think it is a potent instrument for championing the cause of vegetarian way of life.

Regards,

Bal Patil

Secretary-General, All India Jain Minority Forum, New Delhi,
Ex-Member, Media Expert Committee, Govt. of India,
Ex- Member, Maharashtra State Minority Commission, Govt.of Maharashtra, Mumbai.
Co-Author: JAINISM (Macmillan Co 1974). with Colette Caillat, (Member Institut de France, Paris,) & A.N.Upadhye, My translation of Dr.L. Alsdorf’s German Beitraege zur Geschichte von Vegetarismus und Rinderverehrung in Indien (History of Vegetarianism and Cow worship In Ancient India) is presently being edited for publication (Routledge, London) by Dr. Bollee, Indologist.

Jerry Foster Says:

American farmers use technological advances to build and operate modern livestock, poultry and crop production systems in the quest to provide high quality food to a hungry nation and World.

Exaggerated articles like this and the associated comments spread mis-information, cause undue hysteria and damage the personal and professional reputations of may hard working American farmers.

Rather than accepting this article and the associated comments as the only side of the story, wise readers will seek out information from other sources. Try Google searches on Conversations on Animal Care, The National Pork Board and search for Chris Chinn on U Tube. You will find that America’s hard working farmers present their side of the story in a more reasonable and less slanderous fashion.

reader Says:

OMG, listen to what the National Pork Board says?

That’s like talking to concentration camp guards about how much the “workers” enjoy their facilities and activities.

Anonymous Says:

I wonder what the shill who wants us all to take the National Pork Board’s side with even weight to hard hitting journalism thinks the exaggerated parts of the article were?

Geetha Thurairajah Says:

This is a powerful article- providing a detailed synopsis of a deeper string of issues associated with the fast food industry. Anyone who argues that independent farmers are having an easy time surviving in this age of factory farming clearly does not have a well rounded understanding of the issues associated with this sickening industry.

Fast food corporations need to be held accountable for an endless list of abuses that affect each and every one of us, monetarily, environmentally and physically.

Please check out http://valuethemeal.blogspot.com for more information about this topic and the movement to stop the corporate abuse of the fast food industry.

Jeanelle Lust Says:

Not to be missed concerning the changes in the meat packing industrry is the cultural devastation the the lack of well-paying ag related jobs have on the traditional way of life in rural America. Read Nick Reding’s Methland: The Death and Life of an American Small Town.

Observer Says:

To Geetha: How can we have a fast food industry that is not corporate?

soozy duncan Says:

Being both smug and vegan, I’d like to point out that the quickest and surest way to eliminate these practices would be to eliminate demand for the end product. The gap between words and results is the unwillingness of individuals to compromise personal preferences in pursuit of a stated purpose. American culture and the corporate food industry have won a considerable PR battle in convincing people that they deserve certain foods and that not having these is some unconscionable form of self-denial. So we pursue “alternatives”, such as free-range chickens or grass-fed cattle, which do nothing to change the existing machine and which, should they adequately gain in popularity, will ultimately fall prey to the same designed relaxation of standards that created the original system in the first place. Like carbon sequestration or purchasing emission offsets, it’s myth– our lifestyles are not sustainable, and we’re going to have to make some potentially uncomfortable changes before they are.

Great piece, Arun.

And to close, my favorite passage from the original Rolling Stone article:

“The lagoons themselves are so viscous and venomous that if someone falls in it is foolish to try to save him….. In another instance, a worker who was repairing a lagoon in Michigan was overcome by the fumes and fell in. His fifteen-year-old nephew dived in to save him but was overcome, the worker’s cousin went in to save the teenager but was overcome, the worker’s older brother dived in to save them but was overcome, and then the worker’s father dived in. They all died in pig shit.”

Richard Tidyman Says:

Watch the movie “Fresh” for some possible, and necessary changes.

Farmer Brown (who ever he is) Says:

We should all be happy that Gregory Butler has given unto us some of his “wisdom.” Okay, I’m being sarcastic. Seriously, this is a straw man argument, as Butler asks the question: “So, what’s your answer?”

Gupta is indicting the factory farming industry and “Big Food”, but Butler jumps ahead and begins to conjure what he imagines Gupta might say are the alternatives and then Butler knocks them down in devastating fashion. Good work Butler! Butler even smuggly suggest that one of the hottest essays in Left media this week is “the worst article this website has published in a long long time!”

Oh, Gupta, The Indypendent and alternet.org are rushing to retract the article now!

Butler also conflates the real problem of body issue with the real health crisis of obesity. Gupta is making the linkage between obesity (a national health crisis), factory farming and the corporate food industry’s advertisement/marketing. The double whammy is of course that coupled with the food industry’s marketing of unhealthy food is the corporate news media marketing of ideal body types - these two are distinct.

David T. Gray Says:

There is absolutely nothing wrong with this article, that is if you want to hear the truth. A recent documentary was done by a filmmaker who wanted to know just what went into the production, distribution and consumption of the FOOD that Americans eat, right now, today.

He was very purposeful in seeking out ANY and all information that the companies involved in this process could provide and share with him. Since post-release their lobbiests first umbrella of defence is usually

” This was a very one-sided portrayal of the food industry and the essential value that is placed upon our endeavors to provide the very best of nutritional sustenance for the American public. Why wasn’t any MEMBER of the food industry given a chance to participate in it’s production?”

Well, the reason for that is, he DID solicit the input of DOZENS of food-producing companies/corporations and they REFUSED to make any statements. PERIOD. The exact same thing happened when Bill Moyers presented an expose of the chemical industry which has a DIRECT tie-in with our food industry. Just look at the table of nutrients that accompanies this article if you doubt it! He solicited input from the chemical manufacturers and he got NO response.

Essentially they already KNOW that they are not doing the right thing for the citizens that consume their products because they would rather endanger millions of unsuspecting citizens than fully test & inspect their products because it would cost too much

MMMMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNNNEEEEEEEEEEEYYYYYYYYYYYY

and we CAN”T have that little millstone wrapped around any American corporate entity.

This does not happen in other “irrelevent” countries because they REFUSE to poison their citizens. That is why US companies have to resort to FREE-TRADE agreements to force other countries to accept US food that is inspected at a rate that is 1/100th of the inspection rate of some other countries. These same companies complain loudly to our well-CORPORATIZED politicians in DC to punish these “miscreants” who dare to disallow US food products from freely infecting their citizenry. To no avail, every bogus lawsuit that has been brought by a US company has been thrown out. Must be nice to have a watchdog agency in place that is not under the complete control of the industries that they are supposed to WATCHDOG!!

Ahhh…another sterling example of American free-marketeering…at which we are the unchallenged “superpower”. Or should I say “stuporpower”.

David T. Gray
Claremont, NH

Sandra Gardner Says:

This is right on. I did my thesis on disordered eating and my conclusion was that society was creating the addiction to (highly processed) food. The corporate food system is a really evil empire. This is important as far as the animals that are used merely to end up in someone’s gullet.

J sub D Says:

Arun Gupta wrote:

“If a new killer virus appears, like the Spanish Flu that killed tens of millions after World War I, factory farms will have played a central role in its genesis”.

J sub D writes:

If WW III happens, like WW II that killed tens of millions after World War I, anti-bacon activists will have played a central role in its genesis.

Which is just as rigorous an argument.

Sharron Says:

If only more people would read & beleive what actually goes on in these factory farms. Not only is it disgusting that food is produced this way, but I find even more disturbing how the poor animals are treated. We have become such large consumers & wasters of food. I wish people would stop & think before they purchased this rubbish food & supported the industry of factory farming.

sanda Says:

I think A. Gupta’s analysis of gov’t policy is wonderful. I heard the joint interview with Kesler on
DemocracyNow on WBAI. I was troubled by two things Kesler said:
1. changing behavior rewires the brain - so I asked my spouse who has a PhD in neurophysiology,
thesis on neurochemistry in the brain (of a particular chemical). It didn’t sound right to me. His
reply: “There is not enough evidence at this time to make that conclusion.”.

2. Addiction - “food addiction” is a misnomer. Like “sex addiction”. Heroin addiction, for example
is an addiction. If you don’t have the drug, you have serious withdrawal symptoms. I don’t
think science would make the claim for food.

On WBAI: there’s a gag rule about the coup at the station. The only way we can protest is online, via links. Please see the recent Pacifica National Board Meeting on www.livestream.com/pacificax It is Pacifica Radio in Exile (patterned after www.wbaix.org
which is WBAI-in-Exile).
See the public comment sections, at the very least. My comment is in ON-DEMAND, July 25,
2009, click on the date, and slide the video counter to 3:9:14 for my 4 min. comment.

It was listed as “best comment” on www.takebackwbai.org

For videos of protest of the Pacifica coup (with collaboration by new majority of LSB at WBAI)
see www.wbixradio.org - that station was begun after the first coup’s gag rule 9 years ago,
called the Christmas coup. Much similarity in the desire for a corporatized model (my word).

For information and history of the recent coup at WBAI (and how it is playing out at other
Pacifica Stations, see www.takebackwbai.org ) Who, which activists line up on which side
of the coup is very telling.

WBAIX www.wbaix.org is video and audio by “fired and banned” Don DeBar, former news
person on WBAI’s morning show WakeUpCall.

DemocracyNow ’s Amy Goodman and Juan Gonzalez have protested via a letter on the internet,
the use of DemocracyNow to cut one hour off WakeUpCall (which Amy Goodman and Bernard
White, the “fired and banned” Program Director, hosted years ago).

EarthPuppet Says:

Oh, what a web we weave. People ramble on about rights and money as if that was all that mattered. The preamble of the U.S. Constitution states…

“We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

What part of this is not clear? General Welfare? Justice? Tranquility? Defense (nutritional)? Posterity… that is what they don’t understand. The rest they ignore and exploit.

Posterity means “ALL FUTURE GENERATIONS”!

Jim Schienle Says:

How do I email this.

David T. Gray Says:

To Jim Schienle,

Try this.

Copy the URL address at the top. Click on Edit, click on Copy, Open a “Compose Message” on your server. Put in your heading. In the body of the message put your cursor then go back to edit and click on Paste. It will appear in the body of your message.

Good Luck

DTG

David T. Gray Says:

How assinine a comment is

“Duhhhhh–I added this appropriate embellishment–, the anti-bacon people will be responsible for starting WWIII”.

Grow a brain. Or stop betraying the fact that you don’t have one. Please.

DTG

Shawn Says:

Well.. this is as much hype as the anti vegetarian/anti-organic articles you might read.

Bottom line, we are genetically evolved to eat meat. period.

Fast food is crap. period.

The organic movement is hysteria playing on fear and is about making money. period.
If you don’t believe that, or cannot see that, then you have already drank too much koolaid.

The vegetarians try to persuade us we should all be “organic”. If corporate farms all started producing organic food, then they would be “Corporate Organic Farms”.

Does one suggest communism and that the farmland all be taken away from the big farmers and distributed amongst the people for farming organically?

Do you not think that greed would interfere (as if it hasn’t already) in the organic farming industry thus creating more relaxed guidelines as to what is organic and what is not?

Organic farmer’s … you fertilize with cow poop. If everyone stopped eating beef/pork, there would be less dairy/cow/pork farms, where would you get your poop from? Would you then have to switch to chemically enhanced fertilizers? Would you use human waste? ew for you.

Is your poop/fertilizer supply pure poop? Or does it come from genetically modified animals, are the animals on steroids? If it’s not ok to eat the beef, what about the waste matter that comes out of the beef going onto our “supposedly” pure vegetables? What about your water? Is it pure spring/well water? Or chemically treated city water? Here in california it comes mostly from the aqueduct, a place where people dump illegally, throw murdered bodies and occasionally ditch a stolen car. Does not a vegetable consume and carry it’s impurities?

Let’s think for instance. Sure chemical fertilizer kills the fishes from runoff into the gulf of mexico. Now if everyone used cow poop wouldn’t that turn the gulf of mexico into a septic tank instead? Is that better for the fishes?

Smugness is a horrible thing, truth is yes, there needs to be improvement in the food supply. Organic and or veganism is NOT the solution and is not sustainable and is NOT as pure as one would like to “smugly” convince us that it is. It’s as much a disillusion as believing it’s ok to eat McDonald’s every day.

I am not a member of any farming or special interest group. Just one who doesn’t fall for one extreme or the other.

sanda Says:

Jim Schienle: In answer to your question how to email this: There’s a box near top of article, at right, Email, click on it. Sometimes it seems hard to find.

Bigram Says:

Arun:
Where can I get a “meat brick composed of two pounds of bacon wrapped around two pounds of sausage?” I haven’t heard of this before, but when I read your article it sounded so good.

CCK Says:

Watch HBO’s “Death on a Factory Farm”, which corroborates much of this article.

Maria Says:

Thankyou Shawn for being the advocate for both sides. Fast food is crap, but all of us teaching youth to start farms in their polluted streets tomorrow is not the answer. Focus on the reality of where people are at right now and stop trying to make us all think one way- there are several ways to find the path to health.

Leave a Reply